"Oksana Gutteridge" <oksana.g@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fu1d0n$bl3$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In news:48040a0c$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jethro <Jethro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> typed:
>> Actually, the appoint of a female as Governor General is a bit
>> confusing for the poor old constitution... apparently it has to be a
>> "him":
>> 2. A Governor-General appointed by the Queen shall be Her Majesty's
>> representative in the Commonwealth, and shall have and may exercise
>> in the Commonwealth during the Queen's pleasure, but subject to this
>> Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty
>> may be pleased to assign to him.
>
> No, it doesn't have to be a male.
>
Obviously not, but the Constitution is very ***ist!
