Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Idiots > Re: Bush's War ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 8169 of 9259
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bush's War Record Much Better Than Fdr's

by Alcion <andrewranger01@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 24, 2008 at 09:53 AM

On Apr 24, 9:36=A0am, Buford Cranston <cicer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Liberal/Democrat critics make much of the American casualties of about
> 4,000 personnel killed
> in seven years of combat against Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq. But
> that number is dwarfed by
> American soldiers killed in WW II over four years--380,000.
>
> The U.S. suffered 3,388 killed in one day, the first day of warfare in
> WW II, during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
>
> Bush, on the other hand, conquered both Afghanistan and Iraq with just
> a few hundred killed. It
> has been only in the succeeding guerrilla warfare that more U.S.
> casualties have occurred.


What have you got against Ronald Reagan?  Reagan's war record was by
far better than both Bush and FDR's  because there were fewer than 30
casualties during Operation Urgent Fury, the invasion of Grenada in
1983.

You clearly know nothing about what a great war president Reagan
was.   His quick and decisive victory in Grenada has been hearlded as
one of the greatest military victories in history.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Bush's War Record Much Better Than Fdr's
Alcion <andrewranger01  2008-04-24 09:53:17 
Re: Bush's War Record Much Better Than Fdr's
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-04-24 13:14:56 
Re: Bush's War Record Much Better Than Fdr's
Governor Swill <govern  2008-04-24 23:19:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 3:11:13 CST 2008.