Re: Chrysler sells all 6400 Dodge Challenger muscle cars

On Sat, 10 May 2008 01:43:30 -0400, Michael Johnson <cds@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>Gladstone wrote:
>> Michael Johnson <cds@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>> We are finding out that it isn't global warming or climate change.
>>>
>> That's true, if you rely on newspaper opinion pieces, bloggers and
****lls 
>> from the carbon emitting industries for your science and wear a tinfoil

>> beanie while ranting paranoically about it being a big socialist
conspiracy 
>> engineered by Al Gore.  There hasn't been a single peer reviewed paper 
>> published that refutes the fact that global warming is happening.  Most
of 
>> the "scientists" have not worked in the field for over a decade or
haven't 
>> the qualifications to know anything about it.
>
>How many environmental doomsday scenarios have been thrown at the public 
>over the last 50 years?  How much money has Al Gore made off of his 
>gibberish he spouts over global warming?  What exactly is his carbon 
>footprint?  He is a hypocrite at best and a lying politician stuffing 
>his pockets with millions of dollars by scaring people at worst.  None 
>of these scientists on either side knows what is going on with the 
>climate.  They think CO2 is the prime motivator of global warming and 
>this is simply not true.  Their computer models don't take into account 
>everything that effects climate like the changing tilt of the Earth, 
>solar output, solar winds, etc.  Why is Mars warming along with the 
>Earth?  Is it those SUVs those Martians are driving?  The Earth hasn't 
>gotten any warmer since 1998.  Why is that?  These yahoos that tout 
>themselves as so called climate experts think they have it all figured 
>out when, in reality, they really don't know ****.
>
>These environmentalists want us to spend all our precious resources on 
>prevention when we should be more concerned with mitigation.  Even if 
>warming is occurring they don't know why it is occurring and therefore 
>it may be a result of something we can't control, like solar output.  A 
>good real world example of what I am talking about is biofuels.  This 
>ridiculous legislation passed by Congress mandating biofuels is 
>literally killing people in poor countries.  If we let these 
>environmentalist wackos run a muck and dictate how we live then the 
>death count could be in the hundreds of millions if not billions.  But 
>then that probably would bother the most radical of them much as they 
>think there are too many humans on the planet anyway.
>
>> Relying on their opinions is tantamount to relying on your dentist's
opinion 
>> about cancer treatment.  Just because he's a doctor doesn't mean he's
an 
>> expert.  You obviously don't know that.
>
>I rely on common sense which tells me to be highly skeptical of people 
>that propagate fear and doomsday scenarios.  Especially when they are 
>profiting from it like Al Gore and scientists collecting millions in 
>grant money on both sides.  Why are these people that used the term 
>global warming now calling it climate change?  Could it be that global 
>warming is now really global cooling?  You do know we are due for an ice 
>age?  Given a choice between the two I'll take the warming before the 
>cooling.  How many people died in the Little Ice Age?

Earth does not necessarily spin on the exact same axis each year, each
year deviating just the slightest.  Not one factor explains the
warming trend, just as not one factor explains the extreme cold spells
and snowfall in the Northeast and Midwest.  Over time, the earth will
again correct itself and then we may see Global Cooling.  If you truly
want to see what cycles the earth will go through, get a copy of the
Farmers Almanc and read it.  You are just as well off to do that
rather than believe Al Gore and his manufactured junk science.  

If the earth were to spin off one of it axis by just a tenth degree,
each year, over thousands of years, things would change over this very
long time.  Eventually the earth would return to a repetative
rotation, one that has already been realized to start all over again. 
Take a pencil and mark an origin.  From that origin, mark a radius at
some distance from the origin, strike a line.  From that radius,
strike back to the origin.  Strike another line fromt he origin to the
same radial distance but a degree off, then back to the orgin.  Repeat
the process and eventually you have 360 lines returning to the
original line scribed from the origin.