TomTom <tt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In news:68ule8F2v1ojqU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> typed:
>> TomTom <tt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> In news:68u72vF2uvvg1U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> typed:
>>>> Horry <horacewachope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Horry <horacewachope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> Fun Tyme <fntym@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Sir John Howard <sirjohnhoward@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That we wont see that stuff he listed.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Even the dud and that fool swan wont be able to **** the
>>>>>>>>>> current economy, you watch.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It wont even be as much of a horror budget as Howard
>>>>>>>>>> and Costello had with their first budget either.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And it was always terminally stupid to be handing out baby
>>>>>>>>>> bonuses and child payments etc to the middle class and the
>>>>>>>>>> higher income earners.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And distinctly arguable if it makes any sense to be having
>>>>>>>>>> the brat bonus to the dregs of society in spades.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Quite distinct !
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This baby bonus bull**** is the perfect start for a LIFETIME
>>>>>>>>> of welfare sup****t for **** kids of **** welfare bludging
>>>>>>>>> parents.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gunna be interesting to see how much of that we get with the
>>>>>>>> lowest unemployment rate for 35+ years, if we do manage to keep
>>>>>>>> that until they are old enough to work.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A cash reward for being useless.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> And with the worst of them it basically pays for the drugs
>>>>>>>> their useless ****wit 'parents' are ingesting.
>>>>
>>>>>>> And the drug dealers use their profits to purchase luxury cars
>>>>>>> (such as the Lexus LS Saloon and the S-type Jaguar) -- both of
>>>>>>> which will be subject to Swan's new luxury car tax of 33%.
>>>>
>>>>>> No drug dealer will give a flying red **** about that.
>>>>
>>>>> True, but they'll still be paying the higher 33% tax on their
>>>>> luxury automobiles
>>>>
>>>> Nope, their customers will.
>>>>
>>>>> with leather upholstry, woodgrain trim, and inbuilt surround-sound
>>>>> ghettoblasters. That new tax will generate more than enough
>>>>> additional revenue to
>>>>> cover the cost of the baby bonuses paid to ****wit druggy parents.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again.
>>>>
>>>>>>> So it's really a win-win-win situation. The ****wit parents get
>>>>>>> their drugs, the dealers get their luxury sedans, and we
>>>>>>> eventually get our money back.
>>>>
>>>>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant
>>>>>> fantasyland.
>>>>
>>>>> Those of us who pay tax will get the money back in the form of tax
>>>>> cuts
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again. You are just getting the result of inflation back in
>>>> the form of tax cuts.
>>
>>> Wrong.
>>
>> We'll see...
> Not until you get those eyes tested again.
Wont help with yours, you've wanked yourself completely blind.
>>> The surpluses enabling all those tax cuts are *not* the result of
inflation.
>> Inflation is what increases the tax take that needs tax cuts to return
to the level of taxation before the inflation
>> happened, ****wit.
> Bull-****.
Your sig is supposed to have a line with --- on it by itself in front of
it, ****wit.
> There is something beyond Home Economics 101, fool.
Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.
|
