"Telamon" <telamon_spam****eld@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:telamon_spam****eld-8AAF0D.21564416052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <zPqXj.1139$BL6.401@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "A Brown" <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Telamon" <telamon_spam****eld@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:telamon_spam****eld-9852A8.18070915052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <WyOWj.841$qH4.689@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > "A Brown" <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Telamon" <telamon_spam****eld@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
>> >>
news:telamon_spam****eld-3A9935.20285314052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> ..
>> >> > In article <q0NWj.86$Q57.40@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> > "A Brown" <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Telamon" <telamon_spam****eld@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> >> >> message
>> >> >>
news:telamon_spam****eld-7A89C2.17563414052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> et.
>> >> >> ..
>> >> >> > In article <47AWj.1364$l97.1028@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> > Billy Burpelson <billy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> "Radio Ron" <dew1pk602@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>> But Telemon *owns* this group doncha' know? Or at least
he
>> >> >> >> >>>> thinks
>> >> >> >> >>>> he does.
>> >> >> >> >> Telamon wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>> I do own it
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Billy Burpelson <billy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> You've mentioned two or three times now that you "own this
>> >> >> >> >> newsgroup",
>> >> >> >> >> but without going into any detail.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Fair enough...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> ...but could you please explain -how- someone "owns" a
>> >> >> >> >> newsgroup? A
>> >> >> >> >> title? A deed?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Please elaborate.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Thank you.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks to those that responded (including Telamon).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> First, I FULLY REALIZE this is NOT a moderated news group. But
>> >> >> >> thanks
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> those of you that pointed it out.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Finally, -Telamon- made the claim that he owns it. The purpose
>> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> my
>> >> >> >> original post above, was to 'call' -him- on that statement and
>> >> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> him
>> >> >> >> elaborate a bit.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Telamon wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > I bought it from the creators of the news group years ago.
>> >> >> >> > Basically
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > do***ent was a bill of sale or sales agreement, which
effected
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > transfer of owner****p. It has turned out to be a very good
>> >> >> >> > deal
>> >> >> >> > for
>> >> >> >> > me
>> >> >> >> > except for a few people I have to put up with.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Telamon, thanks for the response; however, your brief
>> >> >> >> explanation
>> >> >> >> generated more questions than it answered.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> First, you say your "bill of sale or sales agreement" is a "
>> >> >> >> *transfer*
>> >> >> >> of owner****p". Fair enough. That explains the 'transfer' part.
>> >> >> >> But
>> >> >> >> you
>> >> >> >> did not address how it is actually *owned* in the first place,
>> >> >> >> either
>> >> >> >> by
>> >> >> >> you or others. Are you saying that if I started a news group
on
>> >> >> >> some
>> >> >> >> topic, that I would own it and then could actually sell it to
>> >> >> >> someone
>> >> >> >> else at a later date? How would I prove my owner****p to
>> >> >> >> potential
>> >> >> >> buyers? Once they bought it, how would they prove to others
that
>> >> >> >> they
>> >> >> >> are now the new owners?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Is there something like a "Registrar of Deeds" of news groups
or
>> >> >> >> some
>> >> >> >> kind of equivalent to the Secretary of State for car titles
>> >> >> >> where
>> >> >> >> one
>> >> >> >> can actually look up news group owner****p? Is there some kind
of
>> >> >> >> web
>> >> >> >> site where we can view a list of the owners of various
>> >> >> >> newsgroups?
>> >> >> >> Reference(s) please.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Essentially I Own a business interest in the news group and yes
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > news
>> >> >> > group is public place to post and read through numerous
servers.
>> >> >> > The
>> >> >> > best analogy I can think of is the sidewalk in front of your
>> >> >> > house.
>> >> >> > You
>> >> >> > own it and are responsible for its condition but the city has
an
>> >> >> > easement for public use. Anyone can walk down the street and
use
>> >> >> > it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The news groups are not registered with a city like real estate
>> >> >> > because
>> >> >> > it is virtual property and yes there is an organization of news
>> >> >> > group
>> >> >> > owners. These are private business arrangements between people
>> >> >> > and I
>> >> >> > am
>> >> >> > not at liberty to name the members. No need to worry about some
>> >> >> > kind
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > conspiracy here as this is just business. The business
>> >> >> > arrangements
>> >> >> > are
>> >> >> > registered with Internet domain name registrars and can be
>> >> >> > accessed
>> >> >> > by
>> >> >> > people of standing and that does not include you as far as I
>> >> >> > know.
>> >> >> > It's
>> >> >> > not quite on the level of the need to know but people do value
>> >> >> > their
>> >> >> > privacy. You can understand that I hope because you are an
>> >> >> > amateur
>> >> >> > operator and not just anybody.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Wrong, wrong wrong......more mis-information...
>> >> >
>> >> > Really? What do you know about it?
>> >>
>> >> Enough to know your wrong.
>> >
>> > I have not seen a post by you that shows you know anything.
>>
>> There was the post that says you were full of ****.
>>
>> That shows he knows something!
>
> Actually the nasty language shows that he, like you, knows nothing.
.....so says Telamon the king of insults.
Another useless post by telamon.


|