* US * wrote in news:otv954l1gt50lilfmebjldjo709d7addi3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:16:08 -0500, grey_ghost471-newsgroups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Gulping Ghoul) wrote:
>
>>WHOOSH! That would be the point going clear over ...
>>frank
>
> You've missed every other point so far, so that's
> certainly no surprise.
>
Not quite kemosabe.
> The fact remains that Bush was never elected,
OK it's a fact. Please provide evidence, evidence that can be used in a
trial.
Frankly I can beleive almost anything if there is sufficient real evidence
to
a least make it reasonably possible. However to data all I've heard is
hysterical accusations without any specific factuyal basis.
> totally regardless of the Democratic primary
> in 2008, when Bush - in case you hadn't
> been able to notice - wasn't a choice.
Well the Democrat mantra since 2000 has been count every vote. Seems a bit
hypocitical to me not counting votes.
Frank
