Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Legend King Arthur > Re: Review of T...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 20 Topic 297 of 397
Post > Topic >>

Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy

by am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 18, 2005 at 07:17 PM

Alan Crozier wrote:
> <am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1132329208.947702.11220@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Alan Crozier wrote:
> > > <am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:1132326588.235015.137360@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > William Black wrote:
> > > > > "Doug Weller" <dweller@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> > > > > news:halrn1p9iiq022pr5nvaibi5jl4rult9v9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > All but one of the Amazon reviews are, to put it mildly,
> worthless.
> > > But an
> > > > > > acquaintance of mine, Donald Ball, has written a serious
review,
> see
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1412026423/103-6438203-2351815?v=glance&n=283155
> > > > >
> > > > > Scary stuff
> > > > >
> > > > > I assume this is the next 'Holy Blood,  Holy Grail'.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I managed to read few pages from this one and it is rather funny.
As
> > > > far as I can judge, it is
> > > > built on a standard premise 'the public is stupid and will digest
> > > > anything': all the known and
> > > > seemingly unrelated things are glued together by some clearly
phony or
> > > > questionable
> > > > 'links', then some ....er... 'facts' are added (with a correct
> > > > assumption that most of the
> > > > readers don't have enough knowledge and/or interest to check them)
and
> > > > voila!
> > > >
> > > > Of course, Templars were in the middle of it (weren't they
always?)
> and
> > > > there were dissapearing
> > > > galleys loaded with their gold... I would think that by XXI
century
> > > > most of the people
> > > > eventually figured out that the bankers don't keep most of their
> > > > capital in a bullion by a simple
> > > > reason that, unless invested, it does not bring any profit... But
I
> > > > must admit that the
> > > > dissapearing treasure fleet is much more entertaining.... OTOH,
was a
> > > > galley an effective
> > > > cargo ****p? IIRC, most of the sea travel was done in more
seaworthy
> > > > vessels.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > IIRC, one of the authors was on TV in a program dedicated to 'Da
> Vinchi
> > > > Code' and was
> > > > doing some criticism of the ....er... facts presented in this
book.
> > > >
> > > > > Oh well,  if it is we'll get a buckett load in the next feww
> weeks...
> > > >
> > > > Do you prefer buckets of the today's politics? :-)
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I keep saying that one day I'm going to write something like
this
> and
> > > make
> > > > > enough money to live in luxury for the rest of my life...
> > > >
> > > > You just have to find a publisher. The rest is easy. :-)
> > >
> > > Just go to
> http://www.trafford.com/4dcgi/trafford.html?310191257-13525aaa,
> > > as Grant Berkley did. Prices range from 699 to 1399 dollars.
> >
> > Hah! I would be into it for _getting_ money, not for paying them. :-)
>
> It reminds me of the scene in What's New, *****cat? where Woody Allen
tells
> someone about his new job, working at the striptease:
>
> I help the girls dress and undress.
> Nice job.
> Twenty francs a week.
> Not very much.
> It's all I can afford

You see, he was getting something tangible for his money. What would I
get for mine besides
useless glory? :-)
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Doug Weller <dweller@[  2005-11-18 13:22:48 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-18 14:37:40 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Mike Dale" <  2005-11-20 02:01:22 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-19 22:37:21 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:09:48 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Alan Crozier"   2005-11-18 15:22:53 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Eric Stevens <eric.ste  2005-11-19 21:40:40 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"IE_Johansson"   2005-11-19 10:16:43 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:49:36 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Peter Alaca" &  2005-11-18 18:13:26 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-18 17:33:12 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Eric Stevens <eric.ste  2005-11-19 21:43:10 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:53:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Alan Crozier"   2005-11-18 16:13:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Peter Alaca" &  2005-11-18 18:05:27 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 15:23:02 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Philip Deitiker <Donev  2005-11-18 23:50:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 15:29:32 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 19:17:55 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 19:20:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Sep 5 14:59:32 CDT 2008.