Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Legend King Arthur > Re: Review of T...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 20 Topic 297 of 402
Post > Topic >>

Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy

by Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 19, 2005 at 09:40 PM

On 18 Nov 2005 07:09:48 -0800, am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>
>William Black wrote:
>> "Doug Weller" <dweller@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:halrn1p9iiq022pr5nvaibi5jl4rult9v9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > All but one of the Amazon reviews are, to put it mildly, worthless.
But an
>> > acquaintance of mine, Donald Ball, has written a serious review, see
>> >
>> >
>>
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1412026423/103-6438203-2351815?v=glance&n=283155
>>
>> Scary stuff
>>
>> I assume this is the next 'Holy Blood,  Holy Grail'.
>>
>
>I managed to read few pages from this one and it is rather funny. As
>far as I can judge, it is
>built on a standard premise 'the public is stupid and will digest
>anything': all the known and
>seemingly unrelated things are glued together by some clearly phony or
>questionable
>'links', then some ....er... 'facts' are added (with a correct
>assumption that most of the
>readers don't have enough knowledge and/or interest to check them) and
>voila!
>
>Of course, Templars were in the middle of it (weren't they always?) and
>there were dissapearing
>galleys loaded with their gold... I would think that by XXI century
>most of the people
>eventually figured out that the bankers don't keep most of their
>capital in a bullion by a simple
>reason that, unless invested, it does not bring any profit... 

I don't know about the rest of the argument but this part is not quite
correct. Bankers borrow money and bankers lend money. The whole
merry-go-round depends upon a hard core of security which in those
days may very well have comprised chests of bullion.

>But I
>must admit that the
>dissapearing treasure fleet is much more entertaining.... OTOH, was a
>galley an effective
>cargo ****p? IIRC, most of the sea travel was done in more seaworthy
>vessels.
>
>
>IIRC, one of the authors was on TV in a program dedicated to 'Da Vinchi
>Code' and was
>doing some criticism of the ....er... facts presented in this book.
>
>> Oh well,  if it is we'll get a buckett load in the next feww weeks...
>
>Do you prefer buckets of the today's politics? :-)
>
>>
>> I keep saying that one day I'm going to write something like this and
make
>> enough money to live in luxury for the rest of my life...
>
>You just have to find a publisher. The rest is easy. :-)
>



Eric Stevens
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Doug Weller <dweller@[  2005-11-18 13:22:48 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-18 14:37:40 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Mike Dale" <  2005-11-20 02:01:22 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-19 22:37:21 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:09:48 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Alan Crozier"   2005-11-18 15:22:53 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Eric Stevens <eric.ste  2005-11-19 21:40:40 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"IE_Johansson"   2005-11-19 10:16:43 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:49:36 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Peter Alaca" &  2005-11-18 18:13:26 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-18 17:33:12 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Eric Stevens <eric.ste  2005-11-19 21:43:10 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:53:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Alan Crozier"   2005-11-18 16:13:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Peter Alaca" &  2005-11-18 18:05:27 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 15:23:02 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Philip Deitiker <Donev  2005-11-18 23:50:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 15:29:32 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 19:17:55 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 19:20:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 14:03:02 CDT 2008.