Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Legend King Arthur > Re: Review of T...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 20 Topic 297 of 402
Post > Topic >>

Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy

by "Mike Dale" <mikedale@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 20, 2005 at 02:01 AM

"William Black" <william.black@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:dlkotu$14m$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Doug Weller" <dweller@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:halrn1p9iiq022pr5nvaibi5jl4rult9v9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> All but one of the Amazon reviews are, to put it mildly, worthless. But

>> an
>> acquaintance of mine, Donald Ball, has written a serious review, see
>>
>>
>
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1412026423/103-6438203-2351815?v=glance&n=283155
>
> Scary stuff
>
> I assume this is the next 'Holy Blood,  Holy Grail'.
>
> Oh well,  if it is we'll get a buckett load in the next feww weeks...
>
> I keep saying that one day I'm going to write something like this and
make
> enough money to live in luxury for the rest of my life...
>
>
> -- 
> William Black
>
> I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
> Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
> I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
> All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
> Time for tea.
>
>

Wanna collaborate?   The formula is obviously to pick a person or topic
that 
is well-known and popular then invent some kind of semi-plausible
conspiracy 
theory around it.

How about something like "The secret discoveries of Galileo?"    You could

suggest that there were other things that caused Galileo to be persecuted
by 
the Church apart from the Earth going around the Sun, etc., but these have

been hidden in the Vatican archives for hundreds of years because they 
reveal secrets too shocking for us to know...!     The church was actually

not too upset by his publicly-known astronomical discoveries, but they 
feared that the other "secret" stuff might come out, so they forced him to

recant so as to try and reduce his public standing, and also as a threat
as 
to what they might do to him if he went public with the other stuff.  Some

idea of what this "secret other stuff" is would naturally be "revealed" by

discovery of some kind of secret writings or inscriptions of the Templars
or 
the Freemasons or Opus Dei or the Jesuits some other organization with an 
aura of mystery about it.

Make it about 800 pages in paperback with a bold, embossed cover and there

you go!

Mike
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Doug Weller <dweller@[  2005-11-18 13:22:48 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-18 14:37:40 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Mike Dale" <  2005-11-20 02:01:22 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-19 22:37:21 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:09:48 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Alan Crozier"   2005-11-18 15:22:53 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Eric Stevens <eric.ste  2005-11-19 21:40:40 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"IE_Johansson"   2005-11-19 10:16:43 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:49:36 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Peter Alaca" &  2005-11-18 18:13:26 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"William Black"  2005-11-18 17:33:12 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Eric Stevens <eric.ste  2005-11-19 21:43:10 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 07:53:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Alan Crozier"   2005-11-18 16:13:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
"Peter Alaca" &  2005-11-18 18:05:27 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 15:23:02 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
Philip Deitiker <Donev  2005-11-18 23:50:28 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 15:29:32 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 19:17:55 
Re: Review of The King Arthur Conspiracy
am05@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-11-18 19:20:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 18:35:27 CDT 2008.