"John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:_aKMf.969$GE2.605@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lurk McBurk wrote:
>> "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:ugHMf.659$s25.579@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Lurk McBurk wrote:
>>>> "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:xvLLf.104$We5.19@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Lurk McBurk wrote:
>>>>>> "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:WopLf.26$AP3.24@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Lurk McBurk wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sir Dynadan is known as a jokester, though the only joke that is
>>>>>>>> recorded is the following joke told to the High Prince, as a jest
>>>>>>>> because the High Prince hated fish:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "It would appear you are a cousin to the wolves, not eating fish
>>>>>>>> but instead eating only flesh."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First, what does this joke even mean? Everybody laughed at it.
>>>>>>>> Second, he told this same joke twice in a single week to the same
>>>>>>>> man. Would this joke be funny twice?
>>>>>>> 199. Two Brothers coming to be executed
>>>>>>> once for fome enormous Crime ; the Eldeft was
>>>>>>> firft turn'd off, without faying one Word :
>>>>>>> The other mounting the Ladder, began to ha-
>>>>>>> rangue the Crowd, whofe Ears were attentive-
>>>>>>> ly open to hear him, expecting fome Confef-
>>>>>>> fion from him, "Good People," fays he, "my Bro-
>>>>>>> ther hangs before my Face, and you fee what
>>>>>>> a lamentable SPECTACLE he makes ; in a few Mo-
>>>>>>> ments I fhall be turned off too, and then you'll
>>>>>>> fee a Pair of SPECTACLES."
>>>>>>> -- Joe Miller's Jests
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> the WITS Vade-me***
>>>>>>> MDCCXXXIX
>>>>>> Do you ever have anything valuable to add to this group?
>>>>> Frequently, for those who A) have done their homework and B) have
the
>>>>> wit to see beyond their noses.
>>>>>
>>>> Yet again, a nonsensical comment. I have been the #1 contributor to
>>>> this NG for the past year.
>>> Only if you lump all your alternate personalities together, in which
>>> case I suppose you can be regarded as the #1 contributor of lies,
>>> nonsense, and phantasy, and perhaps the #1 reason for the general
>>> decline of posting.
>>>
>>> I realize it's difficult for people like you to understand, but no one
>>> wants to watch you masturbate.
>>>
>>
>> How rude.
>
> You'd be surprised. Most people think it quite unexceptionable not to
want
> to watch a man masturbating in public.
>
Your rudeness confounds me. I am a great, heroic gentleman.
|
