On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:21:16 -0330, David Dalton <dalton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> Here's a note I got from a friend (and then I signed it).
> Feel free to pass it on.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Check this petition out and sign it!
>
> I have just read and signed the online petition:
>
> "Equal Marriage for Same-*** Couples in Canada"
>
Great idea. As long as they agree not to adopt children or breed children
(in the case of lesbian couples).
Children need parents of BOTH ***es.
As for what kind of life children had before they were adopted? Doesn't
matter. They still deserve a good home environment.
How do I know this? Observation. I used to live on Capitol Hill in
Seattle and observed many homo***ual couples with children. All of those
children obviously yearned for adults in their lives of the *** their
parents weren't, and were usually prohibited by their heterophobic parents
from even being friends with any adults of the *** that their parents
weren't.
(Often, with ANY hetero***ual adults.)
The little boy next door loved to hang out with me while I worked in the
garden, but his lesbian parents wouldn't let him. It was sad. He was
forced
to sneak over when they were occupied. And when they caught him at it they
blamed ME and had a fit. Even threatened to sue me on more than one
occassion.
I seem to remember that one of the original platforms that the acceptance
of homo***uality appeals included was that the homo***uals would not
breed.
They were not "breeders" and wouldn't be contributing to the population
problem.
Where did they lose their idealism and become just another selfish
minority?
If you adopt from a woman, however indirectly, that hasn't been fixed,
then
she is probably just going to breed again to replace that child.
Many women are PAID to breed for adoption.
So adoption per se does NOTHING for the population problem. Quite the
contrary,
in the majority of cases.
AC
|
