Re: same *** marriage petition (Canada) .

"Gene Douglas" <genedoug@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:uBuCb.5412$YQ6.745@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So once the aversions are learned, and a person is 20 years old, that's
where you begin. And if a gay has as much aversion to *** with a woman as
I
would have to *** with a man, you would be condemning him to a life of
misery by telling him how you insist he must live his life. <

I'm not suggesting that anyone be "condemned" to anything other than to
make
the choice they personally feel will best serve their own happiness in
this
matter. As you know, gay men and women are free to live in committed
relation****ps today and do so.

As to the aversion, I believe that comes from social conditioning. How
else
do you explain an aversion to gentle ***ual stimulation, something that is
innately pleasurable? It is occurring only in the mind, no where else.

> Where lesbians are concerned, somebody has already posted that a woman
might marry a repulsive man for money, and manage the act, while failing
to
otherwise participate fully. <

I would not recommend a relation****p in which one could not enjoy ***. I
am
asserting that, except for the aversion, enjoyable *** may be had with
nearly anyone, and that all that prevents enjoyment is attitude, and that
attitude is socially conditioned.

> ...  And even if Bishop Robinson was somewhat bi***ual ... <

Occam's razor should remove bi***uality from the mix. We do not need three
***ual orientations. One is either especially attracted to men or
especially
attracted to women. Despite the special attraction, all of us are able to
form close friend****ps with people of either ***, and all of us are able
to
enjoy ***ual stimulation, even alone in a room by ourselves.