Re: same *** marriage petition (Canada) .

Rather than including a single sentence, or a half sentence, just leave in
the previous paragraph, and that will generally clarify what the
discussion
was about.  And it isn't an insinuation.  It's a flat out statement.  You
change the meaning of what you reply to by quoting a phrase or two.  Often
the answer to your objection is contained in the preceding paragraph.  And
others aren't obligated to start searching a thread to find the relevant
material.


"Marvin Edwards" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:LGNCb.1088$mC1.467@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Gene Douglas" <genedoug@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:i_LCb.40446$SB5.6970@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > As usual, you have snipped the relevant material ... <
>
> And I'm getting tired of your insinuations. I've asked you politely to
show
> me where I've changed your meaning in any of the editing. I do not wish
to
> do that to anyone, so if you wish to enlighten me, please do so.
Otherwise
> please stop making these hit-and-run accusations that are too
non-specific
> to respond to. I'm not going to bother even reading the rest of your
post.
>
>