Re: same *** marriage petition (Canada) .

But if someone found it that easy, I'd think of them as bi***ual. End of
problem.

-- 

Melanie
"There are only four questions of value in life....What is sacred, of what
is the spirit made, what is worth living for, and what is worth dying? The
answer to each is the same....only love."





"Marvin Edwards" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:SSNCb.1104$mC1.564@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Melanie" <chovhani@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:7dNCb.20972$aF2.2320615@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > If an otherwise hetero***ual person has a brief homo***ual ***ual
> relation****p does that make him a homo***ual? If an otherwise homo***ual
> person has a brief hetero***ual ***ual
> relation****p does that make him a hetero***ual? <
>
> No to both. But that's not the problem. The problem is that 1) the
> off-orientation relation****p is clearly possible and 2) there is no
reason
> to presume the relation****p will be brief.
>
> We are all drawn to people (of either ***) who make us feel good about
> ourselves. This is an emotional sup****t that we all seek. When we find
it,
> there is a "halo" effect that makes us "idolize", in small ways, that
other
> person. And if that person is the chief source of our good feelings
about
> ourselves, then we are likely to become dependent upon them,
emotionally.
>
> The other half of the equation is ***ual pleasure. Because it is
possible
to
> experience ***ual pleasure regardless of the *** of the partner, the
same
> person who provides emotional sup****t may also supply ***ual pleasure.
>
> Now, given that we have someone who is able to give us emotional sup****t
and
> ***ual pleasure, what prevents us from becoming attached to them if they
> wish to become attached to us?
>
>