Re: same *** marriage petition (Canada) .

See below:)

"Marvin Edwards" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Sc%Cb.222$Bg5.133@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Melanie" <chovhani@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:FM_Cb.229$Ve.123804@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 we can objectively say that certain things are valuable and
> good, in a general sense. For example, it is good that people form
families
> and raise children. Those who wish to do this but, for reasons beyond
their
> control, are unable to, are usually considered less fortunate than those
who
> can. (This is not a judgement of the persons, but a judgement of two
> situations).

If it's beyond their control, yes. But "good" IS a judgement. With the
world's population as it is we should be grateful that not everyone raises
a
family. It isn't at the top of everyone's list, even when they have free
choice. However, a homo***ual couple can make excellent parents, so
perhaps
they could take some kids off the hands of the thousands of diabolical
hetero***ual parents around the world doing untolled harm totally legally,
due to their relation****p being approved by law and the church, and with
their biological right to parentage not having any positive effect on
their
ability.



> > I would not call it a delusion either. <
>
> Well, if a hetero***ual ends up believing they are homo***ual, when in
fact
> they are not, that would be a delusion. That's what I meant.


Then surely it would be equally tragic if if a homo***ual ends up
believing
they are hetero***ual, when in fact they are not. because either way they
are not enjoying knowing their authentic self, and that is the saddest
thoing I can think of. Therefore what is of paramount im****tantce is the
freedom for everyone to know who they are without repression or being told
they are deluded.