Re: same *** marriage petition (Canada) .

"Gene Douglas" <genedoug@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Ze3Db.5678$2Y5.2806@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That's the whole point.  I already have expressed my thoughts.  You go
to
extra work to remove them.  And what you respond to has been removed by
the
time you do. <

Uh, Gene, your thoughts are still there in your posts. I have no way to
remove them. As to what appears in my posts, that is up to me, not you. As
long as I do not misrepresent you, I may snip whatever I feel is
irrelevant.
I do not believe I have been misrepresenting you. If you have an example
where you think I have, then post it, and I'll see if you're right. If you
are, I will apologize and try to be more careful.  But so far, we're
discussing an example which does not seem to exist. Hey, take a look at
how
I responded to Mr. Edgar's post. He made some pretty nasty accusations
against a UU Church in Canada. I snipped everything except what I wished
to
explicitly deal with. I saw no reason to repeat his accusations in my
post.
I believe I did the right thing. If I followed your policy, then his
accusations would be spread all over every post in the friggin thread!