Re: Cliche question: Over***ualization in the fandom

Joe Strike wrote:

> I've said this before, but animals represent (among many many things)
> our physical selves - and that includes our ***ual selves. It's up to

Agreed, but as you said yourself, there are those in the fandom who see 
the fandom as merely **** and nothing else.

Well if the animal they choose as their fursona is supposedly a 
reflection of their real selves, god help them...

As I said in my OP, yes, ***uality has its place in the fandom. But I 
think it's a little stupid to think of it as ONLY ***uality.