Re: Defining "psycho hose beast" over-reaction (was: re: "Your actions speak louder than your lies")

"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:qsgaf35k1cp8p7kffbs043fibubfubi38k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:28:16 -0700, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and Ed <edrhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> instead replied:
>
>>On Sep 22, 10:48 am, Sylvia <syl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Ed <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> > On Sep 8, 5:57 pm, Ray Haddad <rhad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> > > >> This is my form of relaxation, to read and post here, John. Do
>>> > > >> you
>>> > > >> like the occasional glass of wine? A fine cigar? A walk in the
>>> > > >> park? Suppose every time you poured a glass, lit a cigar or
went
>>> > > >> for a walk, a most annoying character was there making false
>>> > > >> accusations about you and things you stated? Would you like it?
>>> > > >> Would you rather that person simply go away or stop?
>>>
>>>       <chortle!>
>>>
>>> > Y'know what Ray? I was trying to be on your side. I thought; we're
>>> > dealing with events from 30+ years ago, it's possible that Ray is
>>> > actually correct but a little mixed up on dates or even simply
>>> > exaggerating as such. I even posted on one of these threads that
maybe
>>> > you're the cyber equivelant of someone's Grampa, sitting on the
****ch
>>> > reminicing on how he single handedly "won the war!" But now, you've
>>> > just said you like to "relax" by posting delibertly ambigous
>>> > statements designed to annoy people. That's the earmark of a classic
>>> > troll. I think Silvia is a "psycho hose beast" in her over-reaction
to
>>> > you, but you're on your own.
>>>
>>> Define "over-reaction", Ed. At the time you wrote that, you had posted
>>> as many times to this thread as I had... 7 posts out of about 160.
Take
>>> a look at the following link and see just who had been posting away
the
>>> most. HINT:  RAY HADDAD, at 38 posts. If I had enough room to show the
>>> rest of the posts for that last day, he would have still easily held
the
>>> lead with 46 posts. You had one more, I  had no more.
>>>
>>> http://gardex.googlepages.com/ED_posting.gif/ED_posting-full.jpg
>>>
>>> Define "psycho hose beast" over-reaction, Ed. Yes, yes, I am quite
aware
>>> that the Haddadian Trio keeps posting that *I* am the one generating
the
>>> most posts, but now that the scales have started to fall from your
eyes,
>>> you *might* want to consider that they have been lying. All three
posted
>>> more than I did... so, how am I over-reating?
>>>
>>> [  And, what the heck is a "hose beast"? ]
>>
>>The line is actually from "Wayne's World" and describes Wayne's ex-
>>girlfriend who seems to have serious problems.
>>
>>It's not a question of who's posted the most. It's a question of
>>content. Your posts are actually scary to read.
>
> Golly, Sylvia. Two rejections by Ed in one day. What will you ever
> do? Seems a lot of folk here are now questioning your version of
> truth. Your downfall was inevitable.


Yeah, right. Two rejections by Ed Who. A "lot" of folk "here"
have always questioned your version of truth, Stupid Guy.
Three people "here" are trying really hard to give you the benefit
of the doubt. Many more of us "here" don't doubt that you're
a fat, lying turd. I think you're a fat, lying turd. I think you're a fat
lying turd stinking up the place "here". It's what you do, Ray,
you stink. Fortunately for you, in these ngs "downfall" is never
inevitable. In your case, downwind is the problem.