Re: Defining "psycho hose beast" over-reaction (was: re: "Your actions speak louder than your lies")

Mr. boots  wrote:

> "Stan (the Man)" wrote:
> 
> >Ed <edrhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote  
> ><...>
> >
> >> It was just a snarky comment inspired by an impression upon going
> >> through these threads.
..
> >I find you to be a wishy-washy, ignorant dickhead, Ed. (hey! that sorta

> >rhymes! dickhead, Ed -- geddit?). And, I just know you'll find that
just a 
> >little bit of ok, as it's just a snarky comment inspired by an
impression 
> >from reading your ignorant, wishy-washy posts.
..
> That's a pretty wishy-washy response, Stan.

I believe that was Mr. Stan's point. Ed Rhodes kept repeating that my 
posts were "psycho", "scary", and "stalking", and a "psycho hose beast" 
"over-reaction. When asked by different people to show how my posts 
reflected that, to show even *one* example, after much weaseling and 
waffling, his above comment was all Ed Rhodes could offer as an 
explanation.

-- 
Sylvia

      Attempting to discuss magic secrets in the 
             alt.magic.secrets discussion group:

MITCHELL LEARY:   "Don't let anybody run you out of this group.  All are 
welcome in my camp and secrets are discussed freely.  Poor old Ray is 
gonna get ulcers if he doesn't stop worrying about what I'm gonna say 
next.  I sure wish he would join us.

RAY HADDAD:   "No ulcers here, Mitch. I just love telling everyone how 
much of a thief you are.  Guys like you love to scream bloody murder if 
your wallet gets lifted but you think nothing of stealing income from a 
nice guy like Mr. LeClair."

BRIAN VANDERFORD:   "If he relies on telling people to put a string 
behind their ear for his income... oh, never mind. Forgot who I was 
talking to. Savior of magic and all. Sorry."

RAY HADDAD:   "You can expose anything you want to expose. However, be 
warned that I am sending copies of everything you expose to the rightful 
owners of the effect. Sooner or later, you're going to hear a knock on 
your door, and it isn't going to be the Avon Lady."

MITCHELL LEARY:   "Knock yourself out Ray.  Is there any trick that I 
could expose that would guarantee a lawsuit?  I thought of exposing 
Copperfields tricks but its already been done.  Nothing else comes to 
mind.  Help me out Ray..."

RAY HADDAD:   "Who's talking about a lawsuit? Are you expecting one? 
Must be something you did."

BRIAN VANDERFORD:   "   'You can expose anything you want to expose.
             However, be warned that I am sending copies of everything
              you expose to the rightful owners of the effect. Sooner or
              later, you're going to hear a knock on your door, and it
              isn't going to be the Avon Lady.'

"I think your train of thought just derailed."

RAY HADDAD:   "No, Brian. It's just your wishful thinking and my clever 
use of words.  If you read what you quoted me, you STILL won't see me 
using any reference to a lawsuit. It's all in your head, bunny boy."

BRIAN VANDERFORD:   "He's certanly not doing anything to get himself 
arrested. What *are* you talking about?"

RAY HADDAD:   "Are you some sort of dunderhead, or what? It's YOU who 
are talking about legalities in this thread. I only said it wasn't going 
to be the Avon Lady knocking at his door. It's YOUR guilty conscience 
that's adding all that legal stuff, not me. Live with your guilt if you 
want to, just don't you DARE blame it on me."

BRIAN VANDERFORD:   "So who the hell *is* coming to his door? Are you 
thinking the magic vendors are going to come with torches and 
pitchforks? A stake perhaps? You spend at least an hour arguing with me 
via email about copyright laws, then claim I brought it up, I assumed 
you were doing the same thing here. 

"Gah, I memorized the entire OpenGL API in one night and yet can't make 
sense of your posts.. somethings wrong here."

http://tinyurl.com/2qlj2r
http://tinyurl.com/yvdn3q