On Sep 29, 2:08 am, Sylvia <syl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Ed <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Sylvia wrote:
> > > Ed <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > Sylvia wrote:
> .
> > > <...>
> > > > > "Patients suffering from psychosis have impaired reality
> > > > > testing;
> > > > > that is, they are unable to distinguish personal,
subjective
> > > > > experience from the reality of the external world."
> .
> > > > > Now, Ed, Ray Haddad *insists* to have bombed Hanoi in 974, long
> > > > > after the rest of the world agrees that the United States
> > > > > signed a peace treaty and withdrew from the war in Vietnam.
> > > > > There is NO record anywhere of the bombing Ray Haddad claims.
> > > > > Not even in Hanoi.
> .
> > > > I don't think there <was> a Hanoi <or> a United States in 974...
Ray
> > > > may have been around though.
>
> > > "Sorry, I type quickly and don't catch many errors. [...]
>
> > That actually happens to be a major problem with me too! Still fun to
> > make fun of though!
>
> Hello? I'm quoting *you*.
I thought you were explaining why you dropped the "1" Oh well.
> > > "I've noticed that in picking apart my post's spelling
flaws,
> > > you've ignored once again its main point."
>
> > > -- The Hypocrisy of Ed Rhodes
> .
> > Sorry if I didn't provide a case by case scenario that could be peer
> > reviewed in an appropriate journal.
>
> I did not say that, Ed. Those are *also* your words.
You ask me to "prove" why your posts are scary and obsessed. I am
unable to "prove" a personal opinion. That doesn't make the opinion
any less valid.
> > It was just a snarky comment inspired by an impression upon going
> > through these threads.
>
> So, Ed, is "just a snarky comment" going to be your standard response to
> avoid admitting you've been repeatedly making unfounded accusations or
> to avoid facing that you've been defending Haddad's lies?
Probably. Sometimes you just can't take this crap so seriously.
I haven't made "unfounded accusations." I don't believe I've accused
you of anything. I've simply stated my opinion that, in following
these many threads you've developed, your persona is scary, obsessed
and disturbing.
> [This space reserved for another Ed Rhodes "snarky comment"]
"Snark, snark"
|
