Re: Defining "psycho hose beast" over-reaction (was: re: "Your actions speak louder than your lies")

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:08:38 -0500, Sylvia
<sylvia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Ed <edrhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>  Sylvia wrote:
>> >  Ed <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > >  Sylvia wrote:
>.
>> > <...>
>> > > >      "Patients suffering from psychosis have impaired reality 
>> > > >       testing;
>> > > >       that is, they are unable to distinguish personal,
subjective
>> > > >       experience from the reality of the external world."
>.
>> > > > Now, Ed, Ray Haddad *insists* to have bombed Hanoi in 974, long 
>> > > > after the rest of the world agrees that the United States 
>> > > > signed a peace treaty and withdrew from the war in Vietnam. 
>> > > > There is NO record anywhere of the bombing Ray Haddad claims. 
>> > > > Not even in Hanoi.
>.
>> > > I don't think there <was> a Hanoi <or> a United States in 974...
Ray
>> > > may have been around though.
>> >
>> >         "Sorry, I type quickly and don't catch many errors. [...]
>> 
>> That actually happens to be a major problem with me too! Still fun to
>> make fun of though!
>
>Hello? I'm quoting *you*.
>
>> >         "I've noticed that in picking apart my post's spelling flaws,
>> >           you've ignored once again its main point."
>> >
>> >                         -- The Hypocrisy of Ed Rhodes
>.
>> Sorry if I didn't provide a case by case scenario that could be peer
>> reviewed in an appropriate journal.
>
>I did not say that, Ed. Those are *also* your words.   
>
>> It was just a snarky comment inspired by an impression upon going
>> through these threads.
>
>So, Ed, is "just a snarky comment" going to be your standard response to 
>avoid admitting you've been repeatedly making unfounded accusations or 
>to avoid facing that you've been defending Haddad's lies?

You write this, and you seriously can't see why he thinks you're
psycho, Sylvia?

Poor guy best duck out now, or he's going to have you on his case and
pillorying him in floridly psychotic tracts for the next fifty years.

Seriously, Ed, don't try to reason with this one, just duck out.

-- 
Josh

"You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘Nigger, nigger, nigger,’ By
1968, you can’t say ‘nigger’ -- that hurts you. Backfires. So
you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff.
You’re getting so abstract now you’re talking about cutting taxes,
and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things,
and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites."

- GOP Strategist Lee Atwater on the Republican Southern Strategy