X-Body
[FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <alanjm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
¡¡At 18:22 4/21/2008, you wrote:
¡¡I think tenacious also means picking fights with the right people at the
right time, taking a breather sometimes and keeping the ground from falling
out from under you. If you write a piece about lewis's comments on
traffic policies, explaining how you disagree with it, that's good. If
you call Marc Emery "whore of pot", many people won't ever talk to you
again if they hear it, so it depends if you want many many libertarians to
never talk to you ever again.... If you can function like that, it's fine,
but if you're cutting yourself off from allies, and isolating yourself it
probably doesn't always benefit you. In a lot of cases, I think we should
pick fights with those in power, outside libertarianism. I expect
disagreement among libertarians anyway.
¡Narc Emery media whore, and many in his community don't disagree.
Someone I met at the Walter Block thing, MacDonald I think, gave up on him
since his Laytont Socialism if you get where I am going with this. Don't
start on the "Some help the Tories" thing when you sup****t Ron Paul who
basically does the same down in Texas.
¡You defended that. I joked about "what could Alan say," if running as a
Van-Centre Tory Candidate, he defended the Paul party bounce.
¡Hopefully you can see the humor in it. I suspect him as a under cover
DEA guy. John C. Turner (neorhino.ca - Van-Quadra) said he over
politicized it.
¡I agree, although I did repetedly in response to Geddes once take that
on. But perhaps I will make it more prevelent maybe as a note or
something, Lewis Dahlby sup****ts a presumption of guilt on drivers. All I
know he and the BCLP establishment are on enviromentalist rant for Layton.
¡Libertarians don't refuse to talk to me, and I doubt they don't know my
views on these matters. Before I read that bit on photo radar I sup****ted
him on partisan
¡benefit of the doubt.
¡Appearently in 2006 I didn't let it go totally but pushed for write-ins:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/browse_thread/thread/7f13b9734c1f60bd/62058bf4c52feb36?lnk=st&q=%22Lewis+Dahlby%22+Buday#62058bf4c52feb36
¡http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/browse_thread/thread/c53f84cd2e2a7750/aca94ef1b5dd6a6b?lnk=st&q=%22Lewis+Dahlby%22+Buday#aca94ef1b5dd6a6b
¡http://groups.google.com/group/van.general/browse_thread/thread/d81002e2f1566cd6/19db76c148089658?lnk=st&q=Lewis+Dahlby+Buday#19db76c148089658
¡You act like I bad mouth them all, many I try to get to run for Vancouver
City council and so on.
¡Hmmm third person talk should be "generally I sup****t most libertarian
candidates."
¡I'm wondering if we should endorse M.Dr. Keith Martin, tried to get him
to join, not sure if he's all that eger to yet.
¡Thank you,
¡Gölök Z Buday
¡Writer and Artist and Candidate
[/FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <alanjm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
¡At 18:22 4/21/2008, you wrote:
¡¡I think tenacious also means picking fights with the right people at the
right time, taking a breather sometimes and keeping the ground from falling
out from under you. If you write a piece about lewis's comments on
traffic policies, explaining how you disagree with it, that's good. If
you call Marc Emery "whore of pot", many people won't ever talk to you
again if they hear it, so it depends if you want many many libertarians to
never talk to you ever again.... If you can function like that, it's fine,
but if you're cutting yourself off from allies, and isolating yourself it
probably doesn't always benefit you. In a lot of cases, I think we should
pick fights with those in power, outside libertarianism. I expect
disagreement among libertarians anyway.
¡Actually sup****ting Emery may seem like more harm than a humored
opposition, I have met him as well and am far from impressed by stick in
the mud with one
¡up the ass.
¡Emery is in with Layton he's part of the "Power." A Svend Robinson
backer against Heathclff Campbell of his party.
¡How good is he to his friends?
¡Thank you,
¡Gölök Z Buday
¡Writer and Artist and Candidate
[FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <alanjm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
¡At 18:22 4/21/2008, you wrote:
¡¡I think tenacious also means picking fights with the right people at the
right time, taking a breather sometimes and keeping the ground from falling
out from under you. If you write a piece about lewis's comments on
traffic policies, explaining how you disagree with it, that's good. If
you call Marc Emery "whore of pot", many people won't ever talk to you
again if they hear it, so it depends if you want many many libertarians to
never talk to you ever again.... If you can function like that, it's fine,
but if you're cutting yourself off from allies, and isolating yourself it
probably doesn't always benefit you. In a lot of cases, I think we should
pick fights with those in power, outside libertarianism. I expect
disagreement among libertarians anyway.
¡Remember this one?
¡http://groups.google.com/group/alt.freespeech/browse_thread/thread/52ddbe8e9aa9f32a/acb5d01f0ae37770?lnk=gst&q=Paul+Geddes+Buday#acb5d01f0ae37770
¡Don't get on me about a poitical business statement on a google group as
"private." That's up somewhere as well.
¡¡----- Original Message ----- From: ""Gölök Z. L. F. Buday LPC Van East""
<info/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
¡¡To: "Alan J Mercer" <ajm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
¡¡Cc: "Jean-Serge Brisson" <lpcleader/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
¡¡Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 1:38 PM
¡¡Subject: A new question...
¡¡¡In my case I admit out of politics I have a
¡¡¡bridled ambition, but can be ruthless and
¡¡¡in general things tenatious on the right and wrong. Justices and
injustices.
¡¡¡What is wrong with being tenatious in politics among other things?
¡-GZLFB(.com)
¡http://www.velpc.org/
- http://www.vclpc.org/
-
¡http://www.republican-liberty.org/
¡http://www.bcindividualist.org/
-
¡http://www.bcindividualist.org/fb/
-
http://www.bcindividualist.org/squidoo/
¡"Don't you see what it's like in this deranged whirring blender of a
world?
¡Everyday is an agonizing ordeal, like balancing a pot of scalding water
on
¡your head while people whip your legs and butt (eh, you never forget your
¡senior prom). You think I'm sick? Well the only disease I've got is
modern
¡life, a shnaug busting gauntlet of inefficiency and misery, that's one
long
¡parade of let downs, put downs, trickle downs, shut outs, freeze outs,
sell
¡outs, numb-nuts, nincompoops, and nimrods. All making everyday about as
fun
¡as waxing a flaming Pontiac with you tongue, where even if you do look
into
¡the possibility of some fleeting pleasure, like say, if some nymphomaniac
¡telephone operator with the muscle control of a Romanian madslapper
agrees
¡to a little strip air hockey, it'll be over before it starts. Because
some
¡foul smelling, feathery, cab-jockey slams his checker up your hatchback,
and
¡the cab is owned by some Piñata spanker from a Santa Rio cult in Walculpa
¡who starts shaking chicken bones at you and gives you a boil on your neck
so
¡big, all it needs is Michael Jordan's autograph to make it complete. And
¡even with all this, with all this, I still drag my sorry butt off the
¡ceiling every morning and stick my face in the reaping machine for one
more
¡day, knowing when it's time to flash the cosmic car keys at those pearly
¡gates, I won't be in a coffin anyway because some under handed,
undertaker
¡sold my heart, pancreas and other assorted good and plenty to that same
¡Santa Rio cult! So does anybody really wonder why anybody is hanging on
to
¡sanity by the atoms on the tips of their fingernails, while life dirty
¡dances on the digits, and is it really any wonder WHY I SEEM DERRANGED?!"
¡-- Duckman, Room with a Belleveu [Intelect. Prop. Of Creator]
¡"My vision is of a republic not an empire, a nation that does not
¡go to war unless she is attacked, or her vital interests are
¡imperiled, or her honor is impugned. And when she does goes
¡to war, it is only after following a constitutional declaration by
¡the Congress of the United States. We are not imperialists; we
¡are not interventionists; we are not hegemonists; and we are
¡not isolationists. We simply believe in America first, last, and
¡always." -Patrick J. Buchanan
¡Go placidly amid the noise & waste, & remember what comfort there may
¡be in owning a piece thereof. Avoid quiet & passive persons unless you
are
¡in need of sleep. Rotate your tires.
¡Speak glowingly of those greater than yourself and heed well their advice
even
¡though they be turkeys; know what to kiss and when.
¡Consider that two wrongs never make a right but
¡that three do. Wherever possible,
¡put people on hold. Be comforted that in the face
¡of all aridity & disillusionment and
¡despite the changing fortunes of time, there will
¡always be a big future in computer maintenance.
¡Remember the Pueblo. Strive at all times to bend,
¡fold, spindle, & mutilate. Know yourself;
¡if you need help, call the FBI. Exercise caution
¡in your daily affairs, especially with those
¡persons closest to you. That lemon on your left,
¡for instance. Be assured that a walk through
¡the ocean of most souls would scarcely get your
¡feet wet. Fall not in love therefore; it will stick to your face.
¡Gracefully surrender the things of youth, birds,
¡clean air, tuna, Taiwan; and let not the sands of time
¡get in your lunch.
¡Hire people with hooks.
¡For a good time, call 606-4311; ask for Ken. Take
¡heart amid the deepening gloom that your dog is
¡finally getting enough cheese; and reflect that
¡whatever misfortune may be your lot, it could only be worse in Milwaukee.
¡You are a fluke of the universe; you have no
¡right to be here, and whether you can hear it or
¡not, the universe is laughing behind your back.
¡Therefore make peace with your God whatever you
¡conceive Him to be: Hairy Thunderer or Cosmic Muffin.
¡With all its hopes, dreams, promises & urban
¡renewal, the world continues to deteriorate.
¡Give up.
¡Attrib. Tony Hendra - 1972
¡http://www.nationallampoon.com/flashbacks/deteriorata/default2.asp
¡The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then
¡gets elected and proves it.
¡-P.J. O'Rourke
¡"It is vital that we not surrender this fortress
¡of freedom, liberty and human dignity that our ancestors
¡died creating." -- Pat Buchanan
¡"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or
¡that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only
¡unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
¡public." --Theodore Roosevelt
¡"it is an abomination for a person's tax dollars to be used to further a
¡faith to which he does not subscribe. You want to pray, go to church.
Nobody's
¡objecting." -- Thomas Jefferson
¡"Small Government's A Start." -- GZLFBuday; The Absent Mind
¡[Non-Styled E-Mail Preferred Especially @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
my
¡iready.ca boxes I have that filter much of the tags at the server.]
[/FWD]
[FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <alanjm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
¡At 18:33 4/22/2008, you wrote:
¡¡Hey, you know, that's right. Amazing. I didn't know. I vaguely
remembered now that you were posting my private emails on your site but
forgot about it. It was a private email, I didn't give you permission
to post it. But I'm sure it's interesting to readers. That's the sort
of thing I'm talking about.
¡¡Can you spell party "a-d-m-i-n-i-s-t-r-a-t-i-o-n"? Are you going to
harrass the next volunteers who try to organize the party also? Try
making some friends, pal. Like I keep saying. Grow up.
¡Handling the party with streaks of megalomania is a tad juvenile or the
wrong kind of Childish.
¡Is it wrong to advocate for voting members and walk as you talk?
¡Keep it truthful and you know who your friends are; someone lies to me,
and someone in this has,
¡that is the primary issue. Can't get your mind about that.
¡Fred Wallace and I have disagreements in public but it stays civil
although I have my doubts.
¡They are not private, it's party e-mailing, your talking to me as the
party President; it is not a talk
¡over "what am I going to do about [relation****p problem]?" type question
between two close friends.
¡This is politics. Did I compromise your political campaign?
¡I once endorced you and we have common ground, I know from past
discutions, but that's only known through
¡open and honest discutions.
¡What don't you consider private? Keep in mind I oppose a secret ballot.
When it comes to official political decisions
¡and political views there's no privacy except when it comes to echelon
and RATS scans. I didn't scan your brain,
¡you told me, someone who is also a writer who sup****ts revealing sources
as well.
¡I can spell many words, but not all the time.
¡Have any learning disabilities you ever fought all your life? I have,
many. Now my typing is suffering more and more. State health
¡isn't even looking for the problem, go figure. Yes Layton I'd prefer it
on a credit card, maybe you or Emery can pass it on to him when
¡you rethink what you beleive in.
¡I have friends, and "friends." Do you? Are you your friend?
Existentially it's the most im****tant question.
¡The last few I had reservations about putting on usenet. Maybe you've
changed my mind.
¡I don't need Clarke or Geddes as buddies, if I don't have those two,
maybe one more valuable one is.
¡Zork, a family friend. We go back to my high chair.
¡How do you know anthing about this?
¡Thank you,
¡Gölök Z Buday
¡Writer and Artist and Candidate
[/FWD]
[FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <ajm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
Cc: lpcleader/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many
At 17:49 4/23/2008, you wrote:
¡Dear Mr. Buday,
¡¡"Secretive". It's not your right to post private opinions without
permission. Apologize.
¡[I'm an individualist.?]
¡In your post, your speaking for the Party, your saying "I am for Clarke"
which is confusing if that's you in policy or personal.
¡Maybe separating yourself and putting someone nuetral on this issue would
have been even less frauduelent, much like not
¡allowing or having a nomination meeting which is a civil and honest way
of doing it. You separate your judgement for all voting members
¡in that and any other disputed candidate's riding. This is private? The
Party is not a Secret Society, we are not talking as Masons, and
¡I'm not one, so you'd be risking them if you were.
¡You even saw some CCs on it and I made clear I Bcc, maybe not clear
enough.
¡More a concern about witnesses to what I said.
¡Hmmmm, you know to the extent of how I aided the
¡party and movement? I'd be interested in knowing
¡these things
¡Never got an answer on this, how do you know or what do you know I've
done for the movement? As you mentioned,
¡sometimes it's a perspective and this is interesting to me. It's rather
empty to be told I did something and not be told
¡what; good or bad.
¡¡"Thin skin". This is an insult. There are normal social rules which
you've broken.
¡Normal social rules you can't name. I don't mention private info you
make public. Like relation****p status, stuff I don't need to know
¡but stumbled on a P2P service. Or is it app2app *laugh track* (sometimes
you need one).
¡¡The "administrative body" manages the MAIL! I do work for the party.
That's it. Don't harrass volunteers when they are doing work on your
behalf.
¡You'd diminish your thing to "mail room" just have the moral advantage,
your the Party Official Agent, Official. Your the guy the board picked to
take
¡crap they don't want. Because appearently Liberty isn't including a
separate power; kind of odd it's not a seperate vote from the board.
¡¡Nobody tells you where to run. Someone got there first.
¡No I called it in 2006. You put him there first. You default someone
and you make then stand like a graven image. Or craven.
¡I disputed it. Oddly enough I was mistaken I wouldn't endorce him I went
on advocating for a write-in anywhere, and endorsed
¡myself.
¡A disputed nomination is that, I let it go once, tired from the last
municipal election; I hated the fact I had to vote again already.
¡Sorry I wreck the Clarke prestigue the guy so ready he never had to
challenge anyone for a party office (BCLP President is
¡basically swapped between him and Geddes); I saw it, I stayed out of it,
not my responsibility, poor taste to do it at the Block
¡event anyway; LPC and BCLP events should be separate; no one challenged
him there either. Gutless. They deserve VILA,
¡their own fear of losing and being challenged. It's easier when you have
no incumbancy to lose I suppose. With a brand name.
¡What did you accomplish with this lack of civility?
¡Elections Canada is more concerned with the paper work to be done. So I
can see how they ignored your fraud in regards to
¡the definition of Liberty and Libertarian (dict) [Voting Member Picking
Nominee Out Of Candidates or Even if they Get a Grand for
¡it from their donations / Van-Centre but there were other weaker disputes
according to Serge] - at least not as advertised, and violation
¡of nomination rules that apply to disputed nomination candidates
regardless of EDA status in the election act.
¡I bet the other party's have this on Clarke in the long run anyway if
they fear a vote split and don't want to use the discredited "vote split"
¡claim.
¡EC never really asks further questions, like they know it all, without
any curiosity.
¡Thank you,
¡Gölök Z Buday
¡Writer and Artist and Candidate
[/FWD]
[FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <alanjm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
Cc: lpcleader/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a previous comment?
At 18:31 4/23/2008, you wrote:
¡Dear Mr. Buday,
¡¡NO, you MISUNDERSTAND. The administration handles the mails and cheques
and posts the stamps. That's what I'm saying. I'm not a megalomamiac.
You're projecting your image of the administration onto me.
¡¡I type out letters, get people to fill out forms and get people to send
out tax receipts. I line up at the post office. That's what I'm talking
about. Get it?
¡Feel free to wait two days to respond if it helps, I wasn't in a huge
rush. Helps think things through. Esp. a busy year like this. What is
it not megalomania to substitute your view on nominations for that of the
Voting Member? (You can be anyone or ones responsible) My views are more
well known then Clarke oddly enough. I suppose it's called "Dynamic" as
Geddes said he wanted. Independent as well in this, no brand name. That
aside, noteriety is inmaterial just funny; I hate to be an MP, I should at
least be comfortable with my decision and want to help. It's hard to
offer, it's hard no being independent, it was voluteering to join
something with causion. I liked the VM Rules I signed. Your also okaying
promotional material, dealing with site issues, alot of **** to sign up
to,
¡Someone has to enforce these civil disputes as well, if the BCLP
establishment can't handle both maybe they should pick provincial or
federal as far as influencing nominations and candidacy.
¡¡So I'm saying why pick on the administration? Take your views to the
leader or the other candidates and argue with. I put the stamps on
letters and collect faxes. The next volunteers, that's what they'll be
doing. We sort out the website and run ragged getting signatures.
¡Yeah signatures are a pain in the ass, two signatures are more liberating
and enviromentally kind. I did share my views with the leader and you
asked me to go to you a while back, maybe to confuse the nomination
matter. You keep the e-mails? I try to talk to Clarke, he ignores the
matter, or at least never e-mails back.
¡Poor leader was caught off guard on a few things over this "send it to
you" thing.
¡Administration is in charge of fixing these problems, pass my complaint
about nomination defaulting to ethics, then they can ask me a few
questions; never heard a thing.
¡¡We don't control your life. We don't control what people do. People
do whatever they want to do. People email us and say "why don't you?"
"Why don't you do this?" "Why don't you do that?" And I find the nicest
way possible of telling them that if they want to do that, do it themselves
and ask them to join the party. That's what I do. We just put make up
some slots for people and try to acccommodate them with limited info.
¡Limited like some bous issues that there are not enough members in
Vancouver-Centre without even giving me the numbers, possibly names are
asked for if I know a few and doubt it.
¡¡So, like I said, why bother the people who just keep the party running
and who aren't controlling you? In fact, it's often the reverse! So
someone else will probably be doing my job in the future after the
convention.
¡Controlling me, Vancouver-Centre members who have no say in their
Candidates. Forcing my hand to oppose him on the outside, unless I end up
leader unable to sup****t Clarke. Irony, I just realized it, my advocasy
for the Voting Members, the Rank n'File may help, ironically enough.
Likely would win me the nomination by now, or endorcement. I'll explain
further ironies later on.
¡¡Ok, so at least you're aware of the posting thing , showing a bit of
sensitivity... Maybe I don't feel so bad if you put it like that.
¡Well I would never claim to be sensetive; more an insensetvive clod. I
hope you understand there is a line I won't cross, like friend type
¡things in the literal manner.
¡¡Let me say something about this "interrogation" thing. ("friends" is
not literal) It's like what you do, you take up energy finding fault
with A, finding fault with B, finding fault with C, just like they have
questions for you. Save your time - everybody's wrong about something
for some reason or has some bias, even if you really know what they
believe, they have never read enough or know enough. Just because I say
I have something in common with Layton doesn't mean anything. It doesn't
even have any consequence. Libertarians spend a lot of time posturing,
because some issues are sometimes more im****tant than others. People like
to say they "hate Layton" so much. Big deal. As if he's responsible for
the communist health care system! Stockwell Day said "no two-tier".
The Liberals and Conservatives maintained this system all these years and
"right-wingers" dump the credit on the NDP? Ha! So in terms of the
war and civil liberties, I have more in common
with some NDP people. What does that say about my attitude towards the
conservatives or the liberals? I don't see libertarianism as closer to
any of these parties. I sent you Mary Ruwart's article. I believe in
the non-aggression principle. Some activists gave up on the LP early
on and moved on to other strategies. No libertarian has exactly the same
beliefs and biases. Some of these things are just biases. Libertarians
criticize "socialism" but socialism isn't the only form of statism. this
is just the left-right biases which mean nothing. Left and right pretend
to be real concepts and somehow magically have different views, but it's
just a trick to keep people voting for either left or right. The
problem is all statism, all authoritarianism, all the forms of
interventionism, all the forms of mercantilism, all imperialism.
¡Non-Aggression is a bit out of context if you know Voltaire on Natural
Law (A: Yes, yes. There is a natural law, and it does not consist either
in doing harm
¡to others or in rejoicing thereat. -- [FMA] Voltaire; Phil. Dict. --
Natural Law.), this is a belief in civility in disputes, this is why one
has a nomination meeting, to avoid
¡hostity and perminant scars in the body politic; it's why any vote is
cast for any representation on any level. All can't be it, but people
have a right to convince others to make them it. Those who barrow a
voter's power until they change their mind.
¡To be fair Day may have opposed anything but aboli****onism on the central
level of federal government. No one ever asked him.
¡Layton and the rest, I agree did not help, this isn't even a federal
responsibility (const.) - health care - we need to knock it back, but it
doesn't happen.
¡CAP is more trustworthy than the NDP, and even they can be a bit stuffy,
talk about small tents, but even a big tent goes to far and becomes a
circus,
¡I rather back Healthcliff Campbell than Svend Robinson, and I am no
friend of the Radical Marijuanna Party (technicallity changed the legal
name - some financial things); A ring theif who got off on a secret hand
shake, trivializes privacy (***ual bragging), opposes freedom of thought
and speech in votes, he's their biggest communist, one of them, preaches
"seperation of church and state" while endorsing Reverend Tim Stevenson.
I don't want clergty to vote let alone run for office. This is what
Layton was very sup****tive of as well Robinson and Emery them. Over what
one issue and maybe the Olympics. I think other issues are more cover for
a one issue mentality, freaken obsessed with this flower strangler (a weed,
not sure what you know of botanicals, my mother's a Green Thumb from
Amsterdam, hah, I know ironic. She opposes the war on drugs, etc....
But not the laws, another difference with some of the populist/libertarian
or minarchists. Amsterdamn Cafe doesn't sell
Crockette or show AFC Ajax Games; I find that an insult; it's no Bull
Dog).
¡Interventionism, hah, I agree, but some are calling it isolationist and
nativist; blah! More on the NeoCon(fidence) routine then Libertarian to
me.
¡Discussing our differences are the top thing to do, we need to be honest
and allow reason to sort out the truth, no country ever gained a min. of
Liberty without
¡dealing with discourse.
¡Friday the neorhino.ca leader sends his letter of sup****t, the irony of
ironies. If I'm leader it will be an endorcement of the neorhino.ca
nominee, and unless a meeting is held by Friday, Clarke forfits the
riding, from a strategy, he might be better for the Cannery Row riding,
it's his element. Art and Entertainment is mine and I am happy to be the
Muppets in the Balcony. Parody the "by-fiat" candidacy. By fiat of
course means your lucky if it starts and goes anywhere.
...........
¡¡Regards,
¡¡Alan Mercer
¡....
¡I respect your willingness to try an understand me, I know I may be a new
challenge, your better than those dicks at
¡OurCampaigns.com that slandered me a Gay **** dist. on the site to block
me.
¡Thank you,
¡Gölök Z Buday
¡Writer and Artist and Candidate
[/FWD]
[FWD]
To: "Alan J. Mercer" <alanjm/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: A new question...
Cc: lpcleader/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you understand the these sensetive political situations, well in my
lifetime, I learned to make sure others know what has been said,
¡never know who will use part of something against you, it's better when
it can be looked up in full context, politics is like that.
¡--------
¡Amending a previous comment?
[....]
[/FWD]
Best
Got Payraise? http://www.elections.bc.ca/rcl/recall.new.htm
Gölök Z. L. F. Buday
Three Time Mayoral Candidate (96, 02, 05) and Editor-Aat-Large/Owner of
"The My Ego Times." and "The Official Black Jester Web Site" and Who.
Likely 2008 Mayoral Candidate http://www.squidoo.com/vancouver2008/.
http://www.tmetonline.net/
(www.being-ones-self.org) (www.myegotimes.com
/net /org) (www.philotician.net) (www.thevoltairian.com) (www.gzlfb.com)
http://www.blackjeszter.com/
(www.openlyambiguous.com) (www.tobj.ws)
(www.blackjester.net) (www.feketeudvaribolond.com) (www.snuze.net)
Libertarian Party of Canada; British Columbia; East Vancouver (Former
Contact)
http://www.velpc.org/
- http://www.lpedia.chronicerudite.com
-
http://www.squidoo.com/VEL/
- http://www.vclpc.org/
-
http://www.freedom.being-ones-self.org/
Squidoo: http://www.squidoo.itemshop.com/
- http://www.squidoo.com/golok/
- http://www.squidoo.com/vancouverfootballer/
More.... http://www.opera.itemshop.org/
; http://www.majorwhorefarer.com/
; http://www.squidoo.com/majorwhorefarer/
http://www.bcindividualist.org/
-- http://www.republican-liberty.org/
-
http://www.squidoo.com/humpmebraggard/
news:van.general -- news:bc.politics -- news:alt.freedom --
news:alt.mindcontrol -- news:can.politics -- news:alt.politics.libertarian
Swagtervism/Art/Gags (All Government Grant Free):
http://www.cp.itemshop.org/
- http://www.7thdaystrippist.org/
-
http://www.hypospade.com/
"Border security is homeland security."-- Patrick J Buchanan (2006),
"State Of Emergency" Pg. 14, Ch. 2
"Delusion has been defined by some as a strongly held belief not held in
popular thought, so essentially we have pollsters and pop-culture
marketeers deciding
what is delusional and what is clear thinking, not [even] psychiatrists."
-- Black Jester, aka Gölök Z. L. F. Buday.
http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/
More Quotations: http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/
-- ****tal/Dictionary:
http://w3.TerranTula.com/
; NOW Mag: http://www.7thday.bjsgirls.com/
Cherry Picker Block: http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.zip
-- Readme: http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.txt
Store(s): http://w3.itemshop.org/
; Mobile: http://www.cel.itemshop.org/
;
Philosophy Books: http://www.dr.being-ones-self.org/
Other: Did The Clocks Stop At 1984: http://www.911.****stitution.com/
;
Downloads http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/
;
Ego Drive: http://www.egodrive.chronicerudite.com/
; Hep-Cats:
http://www.hepcats.chronicerudite.com/
; Grudge Re****t:
http://en.ratgrudge.com/
The Metal Plate Stuck In My Head: http://www.firstpatriotact.dubya3c.com
General Articles: Welfare Switcheroo
Response....http://www.aletta.org/indi.shtml#Golok%20Buday
Repost: Repost-from-emailfwd: FWD-USENET: Welfare State Woes.... . ...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/browse_thread/thread/d056cee149b9ac0/5ad86bf27d35e71f?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=2&hl=en#5ad86bf27d35e71f&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-2&oe=ISO-8859-2&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&qt_s=Search&num=100&scoring=d&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comedy.standup/browse_thread/thread/4a89e429d4720d2c/06c8cf33e5293331?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=1&hl=en#06c8cf33e5293331&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
2010 Olympic Bid Lobby (Vancouver):
http://w3.chronicerudite.com/n-t/response_to_2010_bid_lobby/
Legislated Poverty: http://w3.thevoltairian.com/h-m/legislatedpoverty/
Download Free Agent:
http://www.dl.myegotimes.com/freeagent.32bit-1.21/fa32-121.exe
Free Agent Product PageFree Agent Product Page:
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/freagent.htm
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/
Now the non-media members Bcc: copy/paste or non-formal list I am happy to
remove you, frankly the press should know more than
hollywood and public figure private lives so they'd need a much better
reason; the rest is a witness list. Well politicians should know
what people are talking about, oh anyone who wants on the formal update
list can add themself via the website form or by e-mail request.
Related Links: Libertarian Party Statement of Principles (Not Anarcian,
Libertarian)
We, the members of the Libertarian Party, sup****t the following
principles:
http://www.libertarian.ca/english/libertarian-party-join.html
|
