C'mon Golok...
You have no reason to complain. You've been sup****ting groups that
routinely
censor people for nothing more than telling the truth. Now, facebook warns
you about violating their terms of use (which you agreed to) and you
expect
people to sup****t you???
Not likely.
"¡Gölök Z.L.F Buday AKA Humpme BraggardT, AKA Ian FlamingT, AKA etc....T"
<mentalmidgetslayer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:483638b6.44990552@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Body
>
> Never a straight reason, just some robot found something some may or may
> not like and now I can't rebuttle bad mouthing of me there
> when I welcomed the right of anyone to do so with regards to me.
> Ahhhh, usenet your freedom is greater than all.
>
> FWD:
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:59:53 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡Now it's disabled? Why?
> ¡You don't know specifics, no evidence of a wrong doing or quotable
> complaint.
> ¡Your violating the constitution and human rights. You can't do
business
> without the protection of the laws,
> ¡and by violating them you deny yourself them.
>
> ¡Blame (fluff)friends, they have these e-mail reminder things, it looks
> legit.
>
> ¡Going to be fascist pigs or prove some thing, I am going to the FTC
with
> this.
>
> ¡At 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡You received this warning because you took repeated actions that could
be
> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms
of
> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
> ¡
> ¡Facebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this
> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure
to
> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your
account.
> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
>
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: GölökBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡ArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡>Hi GÃf¶lÃf¶k,
> ¡>
> ¡>One of your posts in a group was removed because
> ¡>it attacked an individual or group. Content
> ¡>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> ¡>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
> ¡>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
> ¡>
> ¡>In order to prevent this from happening in the
> ¡>future, please refrain from posting any
> ¡>objectionable material and remove all
> ¡>outstanding offensive content. For more
> ¡>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
> ¡>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
> ¡>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
> page.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks for your understanding,
> ¡>
> ¡>Riley
> ¡>User Operations
> ¡>Facebook
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
> ¡>
> ¡>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
> ¡>
> ¡>As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape
> ¡>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
> ¡>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
> ¡>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks.
> ¡>
> ¡>Admin: G
> ¡>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:03:35 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡Try relying on human thought and complaints not just mindless arbtrary
> computer programing with no judicious judgement.
> ¡Also look at app admin and creator policies and make sure they do not
> promote crap that entraps or conflicts, all I know is you
> ¡accept them. Frankly I think the "reminders" should be to notice or
> updates.
>
> ¡At 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡You received this warning because you took repeated actions that could
be
> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms
of
> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
> ¡
> ¡Facebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this
> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure
to
> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your
account.
> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
>
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: GölökBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡ArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡>Hi GÃf¶lÃf¶k,
> ¡>
> ¡>One of your posts in a group was removed because
> ¡>it attacked an individual or group. Content
> ¡>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> ¡>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
> ¡>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
> ¡>
> ¡>In order to prevent this from happening in the
> ¡>future, please refrain from posting any
> ¡>objectionable material and remove all
> ¡>outstanding offensive content. For more
> ¡>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
> ¡>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
> ¡>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
> page.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks for your understanding,
> ¡>
> ¡>Riley
> ¡>User Operations
> ¡>Facebook
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
> ¡>
> ¡>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
> ¡>
> ¡>As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape
> ¡>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
> ¡>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
> ¡>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks.
> ¡>
> ¡>Admin: G
> ¡>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:35:09 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡By the way someone's messed around with the profile organization and no
> one delt with the odd re-organization of that,
> ¡when I complained, what do you have to say about that?
>
> ¡Keep in mind how many Libertarians use this service. Including
> Libertarian lawyers. A huge market for you. Free speech advocates in
> general.
>
> ¡At 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡You received this warning because you took repeated actions that could
be
> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms
of
> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
> ¡
> ¡Facebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this
> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure
to
> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your
account.
> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
>
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: GölökBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡ArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡>Hi GÃf¶lÃf¶k,
> ¡>
> ¡>One of your posts in a group was removed because
> ¡>it attacked an individual or group. Content
> ¡>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> ¡>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
> ¡>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
> ¡>
> ¡>In order to prevent this from happening in the
> ¡>future, please refrain from posting any
> ¡>objectionable material and remove all
> ¡>outstanding offensive content. For more
> ¡>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
> ¡>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
> ¡>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
> page.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks for your understanding,
> ¡>
> ¡>Riley
> ¡>User Operations
> ¡>Facebook
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
> ¡>
> ¡>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
> ¡>
> ¡>As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape
> ¡>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
> ¡>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
> ¡>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks.
> ¡>
> ¡>Admin: G
> ¡>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:00:06 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡Inappropriate Content
>
> ¡While we believe users should be able to express themselves and their
> point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a
community
> like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
> ¡is obscene, ****ographic or ***ually explicit
> ¡depicts graphic or gratuitous violence
> ¡makes threats of any kind or that intimidates, har*****, or bullies
> anyone
> ¡is derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or
> hateful
>
> ¡I do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of
> humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because
> suppressing it
> ¡is dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on
> the street, especially venting from home on a computer.
>
> ¡According to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate
> speech.
>
> ¡Nothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of
> this:
> ¡All posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not
> prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are
the
> legal responsibility of
> ¡the poster.
> ¡Why would you be?
> ¡Your censor****p is your fault.
>
> ¡Unlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct
>
> ¡Although as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the
> conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the
internet.
> Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
> ¡violate any local, state, national or international law or post any
> Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal
> offense
> ¡impersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself,
your
> age or your affiliation with any person or entity
> ¡use Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized
> advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam,"
> "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
> ¡post or share any personally identifiable or private information of any
> third party
> ¡solicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those
> under 18
> ¡use information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or
> service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or
> Terms of Use
> ¡post any material that contains software viruses or any other computer
> code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the
> functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications
> equipment
> ¡register for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's
> account, service or system without authorization or create a false
> identity on the Service or the Site
> ¡engage in any predatory or stalking conduct
>
> ¡This Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at
> Facebook's sole discretion.
>
> ¡Why not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam.
For
> instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a
> time.
> ¡I never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre
residents
> for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate
> doing it,
> ¡I rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related
> orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
> ¡Either way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think
this
> was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite
> than
> ¡stopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never
> again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam
>
> ¡Legally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about
> unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can
forward
> spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the
> complaint form.
> ¡https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
>
> ¡Nothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.
>
> ¡All-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or
> slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
> ¡out as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated
> militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better
idea
> ¡and more civil).
>
> ¡Can I see the content that got me disabled?
> ¡Unfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot
> provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
> ¡Does Facebook remove everything that gets re****ted?
> ¡Facebook reviews every re****t we receive to determine whether or not
the
> content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered
obscene,
> violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you
received
> a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established
that
> it violated these terms.
>
> ¡All illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as
> well. Not just the usuall.
>
> ¡You have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this
> is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
> ¡theft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know
> what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
> ¡back it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.
>
> ¡At 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡You received this warning because you took repeated actions that could
be
> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms
of
> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
> ¡
> ¡Facebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this
> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure
to
> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your
account.
> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
>
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: GölökBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡ArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡>Hi GÃf¶lÃf¶k,
> ¡>
> ¡>One of your posts in a group was removed because
> ¡>it attacked an individual or group. Content
> ¡>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> ¡>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
> ¡>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
> ¡>
> ¡>In order to prevent this from happening in the
> ¡>future, please refrain from posting any
> ¡>objectionable material and remove all
> ¡>outstanding offensive content. For more
> ¡>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
> ¡>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
> ¡>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
> page.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks for your understanding,
> ¡>
> ¡>Riley
> ¡>User Operations
> ¡>Facebook
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
> ¡>
> ¡>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
> ¡>
> ¡>As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape
> ¡>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
> ¡>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
> ¡>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks.
> ¡>
> ¡>Admin: G
> ¡>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:16:14 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡One of your posts in a group was removed because it attacked an
> individual or group. Content that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, we are unable to provide
> details regarding the removed content.
>
> ¡In order to prevent this from happening in the future, please refrain
> from posting any objectionable material and remove all outstanding
> offensive content. For more information on conduct prohibited by
> Facebook, please read our Terms of Use, which can be accessed by
clicking
> on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
> ¡
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
>
> ¡The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
>
> ¡As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape exploitation, general
> rape, gambling, stock trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
e-mailling
> of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
>
> ¡Thanks.
>
> ¡Admin: G
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:53:35 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook <warning#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡At 13:16 5/6/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi,
>
> ¡Our systems indicate that you've been misusing certain features on the
> site. This email serves as a warning. Misuse of Facebook's features or
> violating Facebook's terms of use may result in your account being
> disabled . Thanks in advance for your understanding and cooperation.
>
> ¡If you have any questions, please contact warning#facebook.com from
your
> login email address.
>
> ¡The Facebook Team
>
> ¡Explain, there are a lot of functions.
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 08:00:57 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡One of your posts in a group was removed because it attacked an
> individual or group. Content that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, we are unable to provide
> details regarding the removed content.
>
> ¡In order to prevent this from happening in the future, please refrain
> from posting any objectionable material and remove all outstanding
> offensive content. For more information on conduct prohibited by
> Facebook, please read our Terms of Use, which can be accessed by
clicking
> on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
> ¡
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
> ¡So you just defamed my character? You slandered me, then violated the
US
> Constitution and Censored me? Spoken to a lawyer about this?
> ¡I may not always be or considered right, but I am not in anyway like
> this, this is as bad as being blamed for an image someone else put up in
a
> group
> ¡that I accidentally adminned on Hermaphrodyte civil rights.
> ¡If it was some thing regarding homophobia, I have been a target of this
> and am a satitirist, I deal with it I fear no words.
>
> ¡Anti-USAns?
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
>
> ¡The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
>
> ¡As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape exploitation, general
> rape, gambling, stock trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
e-mailling
> of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
>
> ¡Thanks.
>
> ¡Admin: G
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
> ¡To: information#eff.org
> ¡Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
>
> ¡Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:05:51 -0800
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡From: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
>
> ¡Now I am getting crap about too many messages? All to different
people,
> with different titles and variations; no one making a complaint,
> ¡as polite as possible the last one very different on my list and after
> clicking a link on (fluff)friends.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡One of your posts in a group was removed because it attacked an
> individual or group. Content that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, we are unable to provide
> details regarding the removed content.
>
> ¡In order to prevent this from happening in the future, please refrain
> from posting any objectionable material and remove all outstanding
> offensive content. For more information on conduct prohibited by
> Facebook, please read our Terms of Use, which can be accessed by
clicking
> on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
> ¡
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
> ¡So you just defamed my character? You slandered me, then violated the
US
> Constitution and Censored me? Spoken to a lawyer about this?
> ¡I may not always be or considered right, but I am not in anyway like
> this, this is as bad as being blamed for an image someone else put up in
a
> group
> ¡that I accidentally adminned on Hermaphrodyte civil rights.
> ¡If it was some thing regarding homophobia, I have been a target of this
> and am a satitirist, I deal with it I fear no words.
>
> ¡Anti-USAns?
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
>
> ¡The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
>
> ¡As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape exploitation, general
> rape, gambling, stock trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
e-mailling
> of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
>
> ¡Thanks.
>
> ¡Admin: G
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Bcc: Many
>
> ¡It's confusing because you didn't delete or remove specifics or make
> claims; people show me things. This is why I know.
>
> ¡My groups sent similar messages some members belong to multiples, no
one
> complained, and no one complained to me, in fact
> ¡I got only sup****t. From 2 people vs. 0 *****ing or opposing.
> ¡Now they can't make a rebuttle because you shut the message out. You
> defame me and them this way. It's refusing someone the
> ¡right to rebuttle that makes it so aweful, it should be their choice to
> disagree publically or via messages.
> ¡Easily deleted ones. I even helped people learn how to block things
like
> causes and groups and events with links to the app pages
> ¡because they said they didn't want them and I didn't want to
accidentally
> send them anything they didn't want.
> ¡People can be stupid, but even idiots of the moment aren't lacking in
the
> common view of the conscientious individual.
>
> ¡FREEDOM NOW! Damn well tell me all the details of yours and a user's
> complaint, I demand to know, I can only guess the pettiness.
> ¡I make commentaries and have suspicions, some blue humor and I expect
> parents to be parents and keep an eye on their kids. Don't you,
> ¡your business is in California and subject to the US Constitution and
the
> laws within. Do not forget this. You can't silence anyone
everywhere.
> ¡If this is cleared up, I will publically compliment what is done right,
> your doing wrong and I don't know why, I need reason, reason is a
founding
> ¡father favored concept you know, in fact put the bill of rights and US
> Constitution in your
>
> ¡Okay at first I thought it was that but all comments were removed.
> ¡How would anyone correct or know anything with a policy this stupid,
it's
> speach genocide (think in context and hyperbole before
> ¡assuming I called you a mass murderer, although in intellectual terms,
> not far off.).
>
> ¡What would happen with a Libertarian boycott? There's still usenet to
> get the message.
>
> ¡Maybe someone like me can work with the EFF and LP to build my recent
> concept LibertyBook to challenge.
>
> ¡Hey Search NAMBLA under groups and then judge me you monsters.
Pedophile
> propaganda can
> ¡get accross but I am attacked over some commentary or (fluff) reminders
> that make you think that's legit to send out.
> ¡But that example aside, your insane, by removing all including admin
> status; who complained, Patrick Mahlia is the
> ¡only NPA Member I know is on my list.
>
> ¡I never lied about anyone, there was nothing hateful back to ***ually
> explicit. The ****n chan group I took over didn't even (you'd think the
> groups I created and admined would be inaccessible not de-admined, like
my
> posts.).
>
> ¡FASCISM ALERT!
>
> ¡You censored: "Sulltan of the Sulliban Bans Liberty"
> ¡It was a harmless commentary and I have never banned or deleted a
> rebuttle or would.
> ¡http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=4364&uid=10166022979
> ¡"Displaying all 4 posts by 2 people.
>
> ¡Post deleted on May 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM.
>
> ¡Post deleted on May 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM.
>
>
> ¡Post #3
> ¡1 reply
> ¡John C. Turner replied to Gölök's post
> ¡19 hours ago
> ¡Hear, Hear, I second you on that line of thought, or at least most of
it,
> I should know seeing as I collected around 180 signatures recently. I
> could tell you many, many stories (such as putting Joy McPhail on the
run,
> but I digress) and as you know Golok, it was no picnic."
>
> ¡I know some people.
>
> ¡Appeared in many groups or sent from (not with the same members in
all),
> most primarily in my ballot access advocasy group, like my letter to
> ¡the Vancouver Courier:
>
> ¡"http://www.groups.to/ballotaccess
>
> ¡WENDYTHIRTEEN IS RIGHT! (Wed May 14th www.vancourier.com)
>
> ¡Politically elitist fearing people like me scaring up their little
world,
> I am a libertarian I feel it's
> ¡an afront to liberty and even I think this is also an enviromental
waste,
> maybe an attempt to get
> ¡Betty K out of it, run and hug the trees the petition form will be made
> of instead of run for office.
> ¡No! We need in all levels of government and offices to require no
filing
> fee and a dual signature,
> ¡okay maybe ask for three to five issue stances for equal debate access
> and equal televised time.
> ¡To be taken seriously a monolithic platform is useless. However most
of
> the Candidates, and unlike
> ¡Sam Sullivan, I took the time to talk to and were not there for the
food
> alone and the guy he talked
> ¡to may have been joking. So is Sam Sullivan and NPA-Vision on the side
> of the Greens when
> ¡he sup****ts wasting paper for nomination forms to fill 20-25
signatures?
> ¡One to nominate, and another to second it, this is a great concept. If
> someone requests a financial
> ¡deadline extention for their paper work charge them a filing fee. Not
> before running, bring on
> ¡a write in vote space as well. Ballot would be less cluttered if we
had
> Wards as well. One set of
> ¡council candidates for one seat, sounds alright to me, maybe a borrough
> councillor.
> ¡This is a plan made in the Vancouver Club, not in the real world.
Won't
> it take a year to make it law?
>
>
> ¡Thank you,
>
> ¡Gölök Z Buday
> ¡Writer and Artist and Candidate for Vancouver Mayor and Nomination
Reform
> Advocate."
>
> ¡Inappropriate Content
>
> ¡While we believe users should be able to express themselves and their
> point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a
community
> like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
> ¡is obscene, ****ographic or ***ually explicit
> ¡depicts graphic or gratuitous violence
> ¡makes threats of any kind or that intimidates, har*****, or bullies
> anyone
> ¡is derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or
> hateful
>
> ¡I do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of
> humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because
> suppressing it
> ¡is dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on
> the street, especially venting from home on a computer.
>
> ¡According to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate
> speech.
>
> ¡Nothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of
> this:
> ¡All posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not
> prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are
the
> legal responsibility of
> ¡the poster.
> ¡Why would you be?
> ¡Your censor****p is your fault.
>
> ¡Unlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct
>
> ¡Although as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the
> conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the
internet.
> Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
> ¡violate any local, state, national or international law or post any
> Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal
> offense
> ¡impersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself,
your
> age or your affiliation with any person or entity
> ¡use Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized
> advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam,"
> "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
> ¡post or share any personally identifiable or private information of any
> third party
> ¡solicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those
> under 18
> ¡use information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or
> service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or
> Terms of Use
> ¡post any material that contains software viruses or any other computer
> code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the
> functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications
> equipment
> ¡register for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's
> account, service or system without authorization or create a false
> identity on the Service or the Site
> ¡engage in any predatory or stalking conduct
>
> ¡This Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at
> Facebook's sole discretion.
>
> ¡Why not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam.
For
> instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a
> time.
> ¡I never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre
residents
> for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate
> doing it,
> ¡I rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related
> orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
> ¡Either way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think
this
> was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite
> than
> ¡stopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never
> again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam
>
> ¡Legally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about
> unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can
forward
> spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the
> complaint form.
> ¡https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
>
> ¡Nothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.
>
> ¡All-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or
> slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
> ¡out as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated
> militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better
idea
> ¡and more civil).
>
> ¡Can I see the content that got me disabled?
> ¡Unfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot
> provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
> ¡Does Facebook remove everything that gets re****ted?
> ¡Facebook reviews every re****t we receive to determine whether or not
the
> content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered
obscene,
> violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you
received
> a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established
that
> it violated these terms.
>
> ¡All illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as
> well. Not just the usuall.
>
> ¡You have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this
> is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
> ¡theft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know
> what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
> ¡back it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.
>
> ¡At 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡You received this warning because you took repeated actions that could
be
> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms
of
> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
> ¡
> ¡Facebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this
> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure
to
> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your
account.
> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
>
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: GölökBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡ArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡>Hi GÃf¶lÃf¶k,
> ¡>
> ¡>One of your posts in a group was removed because
> ¡>it attacked an individual or group. Content
> ¡>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> ¡>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
> ¡>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
> ¡>
> ¡>In order to prevent this from happening in the
> ¡>future, please refrain from posting any
> ¡>objectionable material and remove all
> ¡>outstanding offensive content. For more
> ¡>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
> ¡>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
> ¡>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
> page.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks for your understanding,
> ¡>
> ¡>Riley
> ¡>User Operations
> ¡>Facebook
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
> ¡>
> ¡>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
> ¡>
> ¡>As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape
> ¡>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
> ¡>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
> ¡>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks.
> ¡>
> ¡>Admin: G
> ¡>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
>
> ¡To: Facebook Sup****t <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
> ¡Cc: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Bcc: Many
>
>
> ¡You stole my time as well.
>
> ¡It's confusing because you didn't delete or remove specifics or make
> claims; people show me things. This is why I know.
>
> ¡My groups sent similar messages some members belong to multiples, no
one
> complained, and no one complained to me, in fact
> ¡I got only sup****t. From 2 people vs. 0 *****ing or opposing.
> ¡Now they can't make a rebuttle because you shut the message out. You
> defame me and them this way. It's refusing someone the
> ¡right to rebuttle that makes it so aweful, it should be their choice to
> disagree publically or via messages.
> ¡Easily deleted ones. I even helped people learn how to block things
like
> causes and groups and events with links to the app pages
> ¡because they said they didn't want them and I didn't want to
accidentally
> send them anything they didn't want.
> ¡People can be stupid, but even idiots of the moment aren't lacking in
the
> common view of the conscientious individual.
>
> ¡FREEDOM NOW! Damn well tell me all the details of yours and a user's
> complaint, I demand to know, I can only guess the pettiness.
> ¡I make commentaries and have suspicions, some blue humor and I expect
> parents to be parents and keep an eye on their kids. Don't you,
> ¡your business is in California and subject to the US Constitution and
the
> laws within. Do not forget this. You can't silence anyone
everywhere.
> ¡If this is cleared up, I will publically compliment what is done right,
> your doing wrong and I don't know why, I need reason, reason is a
founding
> ¡father favored concept you know, in fact put the bill of rights and US
> Constitution in your
>
> ¡Okay at first I thought it was that but all comments were removed.
> ¡How would anyone correct or know anything with a policy this stupid,
it's
> speach genocide (think in context and hyperbole before
> ¡assuming I called you a mass murderer, although in intellectual terms,
> not far off.).
>
> ¡What would happen with a Libertarian boycott? There's still usenet to
> get the message.
>
> ¡Maybe someone like me can work with the EFF and LP to build my recent
> concept LibertyBook to challenge.
>
> ¡Hey Search NAMBLA under groups and then judge me you monsters.
Pedophile
> propaganda can
> ¡get accross but I am attacked over some commentary or (fluff) reminders
> that make you think that's legit to send out.
> ¡But that example aside, your insane, by removing all including admin
> status; who complained, Patrick Mahlia is the
> ¡only NPA Member I know is on my list.
>
> ¡I never lied about anyone, there was nothing hateful back to ***ually
> explicit. The ****n chan group I took over didn't even (you'd think the
> groups I created and admined would be inaccessible not de-admined, like
my
> posts.).
>
> ¡FASCISM ALERT!
>
> ¡You censored: "Sulltan of the Sulliban Bans Liberty"
> ¡It was a harmless commentary and I have never banned or deleted a
> rebuttle or would.
> ¡http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=4364&uid=10166022979
> ¡"Displaying all 4 posts by 2 people.
>
> ¡Post deleted on May 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM.
>
> ¡Post deleted on May 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM.
>
>
> ¡Post #3
> ¡1 reply
> ¡John C. Turner replied to Gölök's post
> ¡19 hours ago
> ¡Hear, Hear, I second you on that line of thought, or at least most of
it,
> I should know seeing as I collected around 180 signatures recently. I
> could tell you many, many stories (such as putting Joy McPhail on the
run,
> but I digress) and as you know Golok, it was no picnic."
>
> ¡I know some people.
>
> ¡Appeared in many groups or sent from (not with the same members in
all),
> most primarily in my ballot access advocasy group, like my letter to
> ¡the Vancouver Courier:
>
> ¡"http://www.groups.to/ballotaccess
>
> ¡WENDYTHIRTEEN IS RIGHT! (Wed May 14th www.vancourier.com)
>
> ¡Politically elitist fearing people like me scaring up their little
world,
> I am a libertarian I feel it's
> ¡an afront to liberty and even I think this is also an enviromental
waste,
> maybe an attempt to get
> ¡Betty K out of it, run and hug the trees the petition form will be made
> of instead of run for office.
> ¡No! We need in all levels of government and offices to require no
filing
> fee and a dual signature,
> ¡okay maybe ask for three to five issue stances for equal debate access
> and equal televised time.
> ¡To be taken seriously a monolithic platform is useless. However most
of
> the Candidates, and unlike
> ¡Sam Sullivan, I took the time to talk to and were not there for the
food
> alone and the guy he talked
> ¡to may have been joking. So is Sam Sullivan and NPA-Vision on the side
> of the Greens when
> ¡he sup****ts wasting paper for nomination forms to fill 20-25
signatures?
> ¡One to nominate, and another to second it, this is a great concept. If
> someone requests a financial
> ¡deadline extention for their paper work charge them a filing fee. Not
> before running, bring on
> ¡a write in vote space as well. Ballot would be less cluttered if we
had
> Wards as well. One set of
> ¡council candidates for one seat, sounds alright to me, maybe a borrough
> councillor.
> ¡This is a plan made in the Vancouver Club, not in the real world.
Won't
> it take a year to make it law?
>
>
> ¡Thank you,
>
> ¡Gölök Z Buday
> ¡Writer and Artist and Candidate for Vancouver Mayor and Nomination
Reform
> Advocate."
>
> ¡Inappropriate Content
>
> ¡While we believe users should be able to express themselves and their
> point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a
community
> like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
> ¡is obscene, ****ographic or ***ually explicit
> ¡depicts graphic or gratuitous violence
> ¡makes threats of any kind or that intimidates, har*****, or bullies
> anyone
> ¡is derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or
> hateful
>
> ¡I do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of
> humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because
> suppressing it
> ¡is dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on
> the street, especially venting from home on a computer.
>
> ¡According to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate
> speech.
>
> ¡Nothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of
> this:
> ¡All posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not
> prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are
the
> legal responsibility of
> ¡the poster.
> ¡Why would you be?
> ¡Your censor****p is your fault.
>
> ¡Unlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct
>
> ¡Although as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the
> conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the
internet.
> Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
> ¡violate any local, state, national or international law or post any
> Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal
> offense
> ¡impersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself,
your
> age or your affiliation with any person or entity
> ¡use Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized
> advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam,"
> "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
> ¡post or share any personally identifiable or private information of any
> third party
> ¡solicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those
> under 18
> ¡use information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or
> service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or
> Terms of Use
> ¡post any material that contains software viruses or any other computer
> code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the
> functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications
> equipment
> ¡register for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's
> account, service or system without authorization or create a false
> identity on the Service or the Site
> ¡engage in any predatory or stalking conduct
>
> ¡This Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at
> Facebook's sole discretion.
>
> ¡Why not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam.
For
> instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a
> time.
> ¡I never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre
residents
> for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate
> doing it,
> ¡I rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related
> orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
> ¡Either way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think
this
> was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite
> than
> ¡stopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never
> again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam
>
> ¡Legally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about
> unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can
forward
> spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the
> complaint form.
> ¡https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
>
> ¡Nothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.
>
> ¡All-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or
> slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
> ¡out as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated
> militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better
idea
> ¡and more civil).
>
> ¡Can I see the content that got me disabled?
> ¡Unfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot
> provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
> ¡Does Facebook remove everything that gets re****ted?
> ¡Facebook reviews every re****t we receive to determine whether or not
the
> content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered
obscene,
> violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you
received
> a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established
that
> it violated these terms.
>
> ¡All illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as
> well. Not just the usuall.
>
> ¡You have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this
> is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
> ¡theft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know
> what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
> ¡back it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.
>
> ¡At 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
> ¡Hi Gölök,
>
> ¡You received this warning because you took repeated actions that could
be
> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms
of
> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
> ¡
> ¡Facebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this
> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure
to
> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your
account.
> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
>
> ¡Thanks for your understanding,
>
> ¡Riley
> ¡User Operations
> ¡Facebook
>
>
>
> ¡-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡From: GölökBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡ArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
> ¡Subject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
>
> ¡Trust computer judgement a bit much.
>
> ¡At 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
> ¡>Hi GÃf¶lÃf¶k,
> ¡>
> ¡>One of your posts in a group was removed because
> ¡>it attacked an individual or group. Content
> ¡>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
> ¡>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
> ¡>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
> ¡>
> ¡>In order to prevent this from happening in the
> ¡>future, please refrain from posting any
> ¡>objectionable material and remove all
> ¡>outstanding offensive content. For more
> ¡>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
> ¡>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
> ¡>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
> page.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks for your understanding,
> ¡>
> ¡>Riley
> ¡>User Operations
> ¡>Facebook
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>
> ¡>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
> ¡>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
> ¡>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
> ¡>
> ¡>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
> ¡>
> ¡>As long as it's not hard core ****, child rape
> ¡>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
> ¡>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
> ¡>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
> ¡>
> ¡>Thanks.
> ¡>
> ¡>Admin: G
> ¡>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
> ¡
>
>
> Best
>
> Got Payraise? http://www.elections.bc.ca/rcl/recall.new.htm
>
>
> Gölök Z. L. F. Buday
> Three Time Mayoral Candidate (96, 02, 05) and Editor-Aat-Large/Owner of
> "The My Ego Times." and "The Official Black Jester Web Site" and Who.
> Likely 2008 Mayoral Candidate http://www.squidoo.com/vancouver2008/
.
> http://www.tmetonline.net/
(www.being-ones-self.org) (www.myegotimes.com
> /net /org) (www.philotician.net) (www.thevoltairian.com) (www.gzlfb.com)
> http://www.blackjeszter.com/
(www.openlyambiguous.com) (www.tobj.ws)
> (www.blackjester.net) (www.feketeudvaribolond.com) (www.snuze.net)
> Libertarian Party of Canada; British Columbia; East Vancouver
> http://www.velpc.org/
- http://www.lpedia.chronicerudite.com
-
> http://www.squidoo.com/VEL/
- http://www.vclpc.org/
-
> http://profile.to/gzlfb/
> http://www.freedom.being-ones-self.org/
> Squidoo: http://www.squidoo.itemshop.com/
-
> http://www.squidoo.com/golok/
-
> http://www.squidoo.com/vancouverfootballer/
> More.... http://www.opera.itemshop.org/
;
http://www.majorwhorefarer.com/
> ; http://www.squidoo.com/majorwhorefarer/
> http://www.bcindividualist.org/
-- http://www.republican-liberty.org/
-
> http://www.squidoo.com/humpmebraggard/
> news:van.general -- news:bc.politics -- news:alt.freedom --
> news:alt.mindcontrol -- news:can.politics --
news:alt.politics.libertarian
> Swagtervism/Art/Gags (All Government Grant Free):
> http://www.cp.itemshop.org/
- http://www.7thdaystrippist.org/
-
> http://www.hypospade.com/
> "Border security is homeland security."-- Patrick J Buchanan (2006),
> "State Of Emergency" Pg. 14, Ch. 2
> "Delusion has been defined by some as a strongly held belief not held in
> popular thought, so essentially we have pollsters and pop-culture
> marketeers deciding
> what is delusional and what is clear thinking, not [even]
> psychiatrists." -- Black Jester, aka Gölök Z. L. F. Buday.
> http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/
> More Quotations: http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/
-- ****tal/Dictionary:
> http://w3.TerranTula.com/
; NOW Mag: http://www.7thday.bjsgirls.com/
>
> Cherry Picker Block:
> http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.zip
-- Readme:
> http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.txt
> Store(s): http://w3.itemshop.org/
; Mobile: http://www.cel.itemshop.org/
;
> Philosophy Books: http://www.dr.being-ones-self.org/
>
> Other: Did The Clocks Stop At 1984: http://www.911.****stitution.com/
;
> Downloads http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/
;
> Ego Drive: http://www.egodrive.chronicerudite.com/
; Hep-Cats:
> http://www.hepcats.chronicerudite.com/
; Grudge Re****t:
> http://en.ratgrudge.com/
>
> The Metal Plate Stuck In My Head: http://www.firstpatriotact.dubya3c.com
>
> General Articles: Welfare Switcheroo
> Response....http://www.aletta.org/indi.shtml#Golok%20Buday
> Repost: Repost-from-emailfwd: FWD-USENET: Welfare State Woes.... . ...
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/browse_thread/thread/d056cee149b9ac0/5ad86bf27d35e71f?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=2&hl=en#5ad86bf27d35e71f&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-2&oe=ISO-8859-2&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&qt_s=Search&num=100&scoring=d&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comedy.standup/browse_thread/thread/4a89e429d4720d2c/06c8cf33e5293331?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=1&hl=en#06c8cf33e5293331&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
> 2010 Olympic Bid Lobby (Vancouver):
> http://w3.chronicerudite.com/n-t/response_to_2010_bid_lobby/
> Legislated Poverty: http://w3.thevoltairian.com/h-m/legislatedpoverty/
>
> Download Free Agent:
> http://www.dl.myegotimes.com/freeagent.32bit-1.21/fa32-121.exe
> Free Agent Product PageFree Agent Product Page:
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/freagent.htm
> Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/
>
> Now the non-media members Bcc: copy/paste or non-formal list I am happy
to
> remove you, frankly the press should know more than
> hollywood and public figure private lives so they'd need a much better
> reason; the rest is a witness list. Well politicians should know
> what people are talking about, oh anyone who wants on the formal update
> list can add themself via the website form or by e-mail request.
>
> Related Links: Libertarian Party Statement of Principles (Not Anarcian,
> Libertarian)
> We, the members of the Libertarian Party, sup****t the following
> principles:
> http://www.libertarian.ca/english/libertarian-party-join.html
|
