On 6 May 2007 09:27:04 -0700, Immortalist <reanimater_2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
typed furiously:
>On May 6, 9:07 am, EtherMajestic <ethermajes...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On May 6, 4:41 pm, David Simpson <farook...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 6 May 2007 08:06:50 -0700, 16.ethermajes...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
typed
>> > furiously:
>>
>> > >On May 6, 4:23 am, David Simpson <farook...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > >> On 5 May 2007 12:10:43 -0700, 3.EtherMajes...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
typed
>> > >> furiously:
>>
>> > >> >*****FREE FUTURE READINGS*****
>>
>> > >> >If you would like more information, either phone me on
>> > >> >07852 867 202, or e-mail me at ethermajes...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > >> You know who I am so you should ring me.
>> > >> --
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> David Simpson
>> > >> (Unattached MM. Victoria, Australia)
>> > >> Bad manners should not be a capital crime ...
>> > >> for a first offence.
>> > >> Paraphrasing Robert Heinlein,
>>
>> > >What are you talking about? And which group are you in?
>>
>> > You mean you don't know? How good are your "FREE FUTURE READINGS" in
>> > that case? Sounds like a rip-off to me.
>>
>> No, that's right, I don't know. However I do know the future. Seeing
>> as you play a minor role in the future, just like you played a minor
>> role in the past, I ain't exactly gonna know you now, am I?- Hide
quoted text -
>>
>
>When you say you "know" the future, do you mean, if things have gone
>as before such and such will happen in the future, or that you have
>some "prior" knowledge not based upon empirical evidence? How would
>you justify your belief that you "know" this?
He can't justify anything since he obviously doesn't know who I am or
my phone number. He's obviously out to scam people at $x.xx per
minute.
--
Regards
David Simpson
(Unattached MM. Victoria, Australia)
Bad manners should not be a capital crime ...
for a first offence.
Paraphrasing Robert Heinlein,
|
