Re: The Myth of Evolution `

Matt Giwer wrote:

> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> 
>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>
>>>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Landy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <Kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>>> news:Xp-dnXQJh83jIevbnZ2dnUVZ_sCinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> What additional physical evidence beyond the scientific fact 
>>>>>>>>>> of the existence of the world is necessary?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The world exists therefore god made it.  Right.  I see.
>>>>>>>>> My farts exist, therefore god made them as well.
>>>>>>>>> You really are brainwashed aren't you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who or what designed you so that you must fart... the evolution 
>>>>>>>> pixie?  LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     If you wear gl*****, what idiot designed your eyes? If you 
>>>>>>> have any medical problems what incompetent (or malevolent) thing 
>>>>>>> designed you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless you can come up with a better design, criticizing God's 
>>>>>> design is nothing but whining and puling hot air.
>>>>>
>>>>>     So this is the best your god could do? I keep saying he got the 
>>>>> design job because of family connections even though he was not 
>>>>> very good at it.
>>>>
>>>> Come up with a better design or get off the pot.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Eyes that grow their own gl***** of course. And while we are at 
>>> it bodies that make their own vaccines and bones that bend instead of 
>>> break. Those are obvious design changes.
> 
> 
>> Those are waking dreams... let's see the blueprints.
> 
> 
>     Being a god the mere will does it all.> 
>     If a god wants light all he was to do is create lungs, mouth and air

> and say, let there be light. Didn't you read the book?

Im still waiting for your better design.  Lets see the 
blueprints.

> 
>>>  How about simply not including
>>> defective genes in the design? What malevolent beast would include 
>>> defective genes?
> 
> 
>> If all genes were perfect there'd be no life.
> 
> 
>     Please explain why that is the case. What is an imperfect gene? 
> Please be specific in your answer.

Nothing in this world is perfcte.  Perfect has no need for 
change or improvement, genetic or otherwise.

> 
>>>     As a god I would simply will it to be as a design it. Gods do not 
>>> need to worry about details. That is why they are called gods.
> 
> 
>> God designed the world so that it would sup****t life.  Life depends on 
>> all the good and bad in the design. 
> 
> 
>     Please provide the evidence in sup****t of that assertion.
> 
>> The mechanism works because all the parts are present... take away the 
>> parts you consider bad and the machine comes to halt... period.
> 
> 
>     Please provide the evidence in sup****t of that assertion.

http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/kalamcosmological.html
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3415