Re: The Myth of Evolution `

Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> Matt Giwer wrote:
> 
>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>
>>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
,,,,
>>>>> Come up with a better design or get off the pot.
>>>>     Eyes that grow their own gl***** of course. And while we are at 
>>>> it bodies that make their own vaccines and bones that bend instead 
>>>> of break. Those are obvious design changes.
>>> Those are waking dreams... let's see the blueprints.
>>     Being a god the mere will does it all.>     If a god wants light 
>> all he was to do is create lungs, mouth and air and say, let there be 
>> light. Didn't you read the book?

> Im still waiting for your better design.  Lets see the blueprints.

	I did give it to you and left it in when I shortened the exchange
history.

>>>>  How about simply not including
>>>> defective genes in the design? What malevolent beast would include 
>>>> defective genes?
>>> If all genes were perfect there'd be no life.
>>     Please explain why that is the case. What is an imperfect gene? 
>> Please be specific in your answer.

> Nothing in this world is perfcte.  Perfect has no need for change or 
> improvement, genetic or otherwise.

	Define perfect. The Platonic ideal was just his imagination. There is no 
squared circle either. That does not mean either is a legitimate concept.

	A gene is what it is. How does the concept of perfection apply to it?

>>>>     As a god I would simply will it to be as a design it. Gods do 
>>>> not need to worry about details. That is why they are called gods.
>>> God designed the world so that it would sup****t life.  Life depends 
>>> on all the good and bad in the design. 
>>     Please provide the evidence in sup****t of that assertion.
>>> The mechanism works because all the parts are present... take away 
>>> the parts you consider bad and the machine comes to halt... period.

>>     Please provide the evidence in sup****t of that assertion.

> http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/kalamcosmological.html

	Argumentation is not evidence.

> http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3415

	Irreducible complexity is also argumentation and not evidence.

	If you have no evidence simply say so.

-- 
Sickos of the World Unite! You have nothing to lose but your health!
	-- The Iron Webmaster, 3797
  nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
  Lawful to bomb Israelis http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/bombings.phtml
a11