Re: The Myth of Evolution `

Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> Matt Giwer wrote:
>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>> cormac wrote:
>> ...
>>>> The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.
>>> Are you saying that Con****ians and Buddhists are incapable of 
>>> contemplating the abstract?
>>     Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly, 
>> superstitious people?

> Irrelevant non answer.

	It is you who assumes a fact not in evidence, that there is only one god
and it 
is like the barbaric concept invented by Judean goat herders. Perhaps
rather 
than brain fart you would prefer goat belch. But contemplation of such a 
primitive idea that cannot possibly appeal to an educated and civilized
person 
assumes there is something to contemplate. There is no evidence there is 
anything to contemplate.

	You cannot produce evidence for even one god much less exclude dozens of
gods.

>>> Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from 
>>> asserting him.  Even denial of God's existence asserts Him.  There is 
>>> no way to rid the mind of the concept.

>>     The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions, unicorns, 
>> and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible to produce 
>> an inclusive list.

> Irrelevant.

	I point out the human mind is capable of conceiving all kinds of
nonsensical 
things actually existing and that a god or gods is among them.

	What could be more relevant than giving examples of the validity of my
assertion?

>>     What does that have to do with reality?

> The reality is that the concept of God in each and every mind is natural

> and indelible.

	Until you produce physical evidence which sup****ts that statement it is
nothing 
more than mere assertion and indistinguishable from bull****.

-- 
Hodie decimo Kalendas Iulias MMVII est
      -- The Ferric Webceasar
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
  Blame Israel http://www.ussliberty.org
a10