Re: The Myth of Evolution `

Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> Matt Giwer wrote:
> 
>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>
>>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> cormac wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>> The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that Con****ians and Buddhists are incapable of 
>>>>> contemplating the abstract?
>>>>
>>>>     Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly, 
>>>> superstitious people?
>>
>>
>>> Irrelevant non answer.
>>
>>
>>     It is you who assumes a fact not in evidence, that there is only 
>> one god and it is like the barbaric concept invented by Judean goat 
>> herders. Perhaps rather than brain fart you would prefer goat belch. 
>> But contemplation of such a primitive idea that cannot possibly appeal 
>> to an educated and civilized person assumes there is something to 
>> contemplate. There is no evidence there is anything to contemplate.
>>
>>     You cannot produce evidence for even one god much less exclude 
>> dozens of gods.
>>
>>>>> Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from 
>>>>> asserting him.  Even denial of God's existence asserts Him.  There 
>>>>> is no way to rid the mind of the concept.
>>
>>
>>>>     The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions, 
>>>> unicorns, and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible 
>>>> to produce an inclusive list.
>>
>>
>>> Irrelevant.
>>     I point out the human mind is capable of conceiving all kinds of 
>> nonsensical things actually existing and that a god or gods is among 
>> them.
>>     What could be more relevant than giving examples of the validity 
>> of my assertion?
>>>>     What does that have to do with reality?
>>> The reality is that the concept of God in each and every mind is 
>>> natural and indelible.
>>     Until you produce physical evidence which sup****ts that statement 
>> it is nothing more than mere assertion and indistinguishable from 
>> bull****.

> Name one human who ever existed that was free of the concept of God or 
> gods.

	That has nothing to do with their actually being gods. Actual existence 
requires physical evidence. I can't name a person who was ever without the
idea 
of Santa Claus. That does not mean there is a Santa Claus.

> Now that the disease of Jew hatred is once again appearing in your posts

> I'm left with no option other than hanging up on you.  Seek help for 
> your mental disorder.

	It is not my fault they invented a barbaric, murderous god who demanded
genital 
mutilation for tribal member****p. I simply talk about their god as it is 
described in their books. The facts cannot be hatred.

-- 
As the Jim Crow laws in the US were many, many times worse than the
Nuremberg Laws in Germany, what are they whining about?
	-- The Iron Webmaster, 3800
  nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
  antisemitism http://www.giwersworld.org/antisem/
a1