Doug Weller wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:36:21 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr
> wrote:
>
>
>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>cormac wrote:
>>>
>>>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>>The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Are you saying that Con****ians and Buddhists are incapable of
>>>>contemplating the abstract?
>>>
>>>
>>> Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly,
>>>superstitious people?
>>
>>Irrelevant non answer.
>>
>>
>>>>Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from
>>>>asserting him. Even denial of God's existence asserts Him. There is
>>>>no way to rid the mind of the concept.
>>>
>>>
>>> The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions, unicorns,
>>>and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible to produce an
>>>inclusive list.
>>
>>Irrelevant.
>>
>>
>>> What does that have to do with reality?
>>
>>The reality is that the concept of God in each and every
>>mind is natural and indelible.
>
>
> Or gods? Interesting that this idiot uses the word 'God' when you might
> think he'd say 'god' or 'supernatural being' or plural, etc.
Moron, the word "God" is merely one human way of naming [THE
ONE], the only omnipotent singularity, that state beyond
which no thing is reducible.
|
