On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 01:16:15 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr
wrote:
>Doug Weller wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:36:21 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>cormac wrote:
>>>>
>>>>...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Are you saying that Con****ians and Buddhists are incapable of
>>>>>contemplating the abstract?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly,
>>>>superstitious people?
>>>
>>>Irrelevant non answer.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from
>>>>>asserting him. Even denial of God's existence asserts Him. There is
>>>>>no way to rid the mind of the concept.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions, unicorns,
>>>>and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible to produce
an
>>>>inclusive list.
>>>
>>>Irrelevant.
>>>
>>>
>>>> What does that have to do with reality?
>>>
>>>The reality is that the concept of God in each and every
>>>mind is natural and indelible.
>>
>>
>> Or gods? Interesting that this idiot uses the word 'God' when you
might
>> think he'd say 'god' or 'supernatural being' or plural, etc.
>
>Moron, the word "God" is merely one human way of naming [THE
>ONE], the only omnipotent singularity, that state beyond
>which no thing is reducible.
Ah, you mean The Invisible Pink Unicorn. Now I understand! You know The
Truth and facts are irrelevant.
Doug
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/
|
