Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> Doug Weller wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:36:21 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr
>> wrote:
>>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>>>> cormac wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>>> The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.
>>>>> Are you saying that Con****ians and Buddhists are incapable of
>>>>> contemplating the abstract?
>>>> Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly,
>>>> superstitious people?
>>> Irrelevant non answer.
>>>>> Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from
>>>>> asserting him. Even denial of God's existence asserts Him. There
>>>>> is no way to rid the mind of the concept.
>>>> The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions,
>>>> unicorns, and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible
>>>> to produce an inclusive list.
>>> Irrelevant.
>>>> What does that have to do with reality?
>>> The reality is that the concept of God in each and every mind is
>>> natural and indelible.
>> Or gods? Interesting that this idiot uses the word 'God' when you
might
>> think he'd say 'god' or 'supernatural being' or plural, etc.
> Moron, the word "God" is merely one human way of naming [THE ONE], the
> only omnipotent singularity, that state beyond which no thing is
reducible.
Who told you there was only one and why did you believe them?
--
Al Qaeda is growing so quickly that today everyone in Iraq who is fighting
the US is a member of Al Qaeda.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3810
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Old Testament http://www.giwersworld.org/bible/ot.phtml
a6
|
