Re: Failures of Nostradamus

"eepeep" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns9452D9CE7919Eabc123unme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Dan Pressnell" <dan_pressnell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:dWtDb.79820$b01.1697558@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Under the shadowy pretense of removing servitude,
> > He will himself usurp the people and city:
> > He will do worse because of the deceit of the young prostitute,
> > Delivered in the field reading the false poem.
> >
> > That prediction is that Abraham Lincoln would be involved in a ***
> > scandal in Iowa.
>
> Why do you think that would apply to Abraham Lincoln?  Just because of
the
> first line?  It wasn't a pretense of removing servitude, he really did
> remove servitude.  There are plenty of other instances throughout
history
> that would fit it better, even down to a personal level.

Oh yeah?  I'm just playing the same game yoiu Nosty-lovers play.

If Lincoln had been involed in a *** scandal, then that prediction would
be
a hit, right?

So, he wasn't involved in a *** scandal, and that makes it a miss.

Get it?  You twist your interpretations so that you find hits out of vague
nonsense.  Why do you not do the same in analyzing misses?

Dan