In article <c5noes$676$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Thaddeus"
<nojmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> This is a very good interpretation in my opinion and similar to what I
have
> uncovered in my studies of Nostradamus, the Book of revelations, the
book of
> Daniel, and modern day and ancient prophesies.
>
>
>
> I used to be a big fan of Nosty, but recently have been questioning his
> character. He was a very interesting man to say the least. After
reading
> about religious prophets before Nosty's time that prophesied similar
events
> enigmatically described by Nosty got me thinking. What if Nosty got his
> material from the prophesies of the saints before him?
>
>
>
> It makes a lot of sense that he actually spent time in his secret room
> studying true prophets before him instead of all the hocus pocus stuff.
He
> was very secretive of his methods and claimed to take his secret to his
> grave. He was also pur****ted to have burned some of his work, and maybe
his
> sources. Such a source could have been the Mirabilis liber published in
> 1524, which is a collection of prophesies of religious people before
Nosty
> originally written in Latin.
>
>
>
> I do not believe in astrology, being a scientist and all, and also do
not
> believe in magic clairvoyance by looking at a black mirror or bowl of
water.
> I do believe in the Holy Spirit however, and so accept Nosty not as a
> prophet, but more as a scholar.
>
• Indeed. Michel de Notredame (1503-1566). was also a talented author
who realized that most people, if given the op****tunity, will delight in
filling in blanks with their own subconscious agenda.
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
|
