Re: (Back-Talk) Kathy Lee Gifford

On Jul 1, 11:44 am, aine <aine_nicne...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 8:15 am, Noinden <thear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 1, 9:35 am, ren <ren1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 1, 10:56 pm, Noinden <thear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Sorry but we look like wankes when we react like this!
>
> > > It is our duty to react to all slurs against our beliefs.
>
> > > Kathy Lee Epstein Gifford should know better because of the
> > > persecution of her former Jewish religion.
>
> > > Where does she get-off calling us Pagans bad and nasty when she is
the=

> > > one who runs a Honduran child slave-labor camp.
>
> > Uh huh,
>
> > Nice fundy act their ren, next you will call for Jihad.
>
> > It was not directed at Neopagans, as anyone who watched the video clip
> > can see. It was not that funny either.
>
> I do not agree. I hardly ever read or hear the term "Neo" pagan by
> anyone including pagans except by Neo Druids.
>
> I watched the video. Please do not speak for everyone who does. Seems
> to be three of us at least who did and do not agree with you. Four
> people have replied directly with their opinion of her use of "pagan"
> so exactly where are you coming up with posting as if it is a fact
> that "anyone who watched the clip can see"?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Ahhh any more so than say ren speaking for "us all"?

Neopaganism is the accepted term, it has been since Uncle Gerry
onwards. It is not my fault that people in the scene get lazy about it
(or delusional). Similarly as I have pointed out the accepted usage of
the word (since the middle ages forward) is more likely what she was
talking about than Neopagans, or Paleopagans.


As for response? ARW is a tiny party of the internet and pagan
communities, another small part is here:

http://www.wildhunt.org/2008/06/kathie-lee-gifford-and-nasty-pagan.html

Oh look, a lot of people who think it=92s over reaction=85.