Re: A question about Deities

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Randgrithr
<randgrithr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Jul 1, 7:03 am, Neolithic <neolithicnos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:57:11 +0200, Bob Thomson <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>
>> >> The person who tried to "save" the moderated newsgroup was really
only
>> >> interested in handing it over to racist Asatruar control freaks who
>> >> were spamming this group via other channels
>>
>> Please be specific, who precisely are you talking about here?
>
>Look through the Usenet archives if you are that interested. I don't
>have time to do it for you.

No, you need to be specific, its im****tant.

>> What possible benefit could 'crooks' obtain from dominating an obscure
>> religious newsgroup?
>>
>> That's just weird...
>
>Yes. Control freak racists are weird.

They are.

> They think that dominating their
>small backwaters on Usenet somehow empowers them over the people they
>feel "inferior". It's something akin to small boys hanging a
>misspelled sign: "No Gurlz Allowd In Our Treehous".

Its dumb alright.

>> >> in an effort to create an artificial "need" for the moderated one,
similar to what was done on
>> >> a.r.a.
>>
>> The need was there alright...all you need to do is look back on
>> alt.religion.asatru over the last 10 years or so and you'll see the
>> reason why we needed soc.religion.asatru
>
>The "need" was completely manufactured.

I was part of the group of people that created s.r.u....we certainly
did not deliberately "manufacture a need". The need was bought about
by the meowers and eitreb eht piynub

>> >> The group of us who are not racists who were approached were not
>> >> treated seriously.
>>
>> What?
>>
>> Bull****.
>
>No, it's quite true, and if that is the entirety of your reply to me
>then this discussion is over. Once again: I don't make time for
>stupid.

Well...I'm definitely not a racist and I was treated seriously...

Neolithic