Re: (Back-Talk) Kathy Lee Gifford

On Jul 3, 4:12=A0pm, "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Noinden" <thear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "Noinden" <thear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > "Noinden" <thear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > [addendum]
>
> > > > Try again, I believe the major proponent of it=92s use is Oberon
Ze=
ll-
> > > > Ravenheart.
>
> > > That's even worse. Mr. 'Green eggs and ham' propagandizing of his
age=
nda
> > > gives no solid basis for others to utilize the term.
>
> > > What is it with american Neopagans? The rest of the world uses the
te=
rm.
>
> > That may very well be, however, the rest of the world may also call us
> > "Yanks" and we still don't call ourselves that, (unless those of us
who
> > are
> > 'Rebs' call those damned yankees, yanks).
>
> The rest of the world eh? Hyperbole much?
>
> - Only as much as you, it was your phrase: "What is it with american
> Neopagans? The rest of the world uses the term."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

On a couple of international Fora I am on the reply was... "what is it
with american neopagans..."