"Steve S." <ssake@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I'd be interested in learning more. In my reincarnation
> studies I've run across a number of past/present life
> "matches", with no known (or sometimes, no possible)
> genetic connection, who look almost identical. Then you
> have twins separated at birth who have all these strange
> synchronicities--not only do they share mannerisms, but
> they even share favorite product brands and street names.
>
> This isn't physical genetics, it's karma based on mental
> impressions ("sanskaras") in the mental body. Somehow,
> presumably, look-alikes are tapping into something on that
> level which then manifests in a similar body, if indeed it
> is found that they share more than just physical
> characterics. I would guess they are tapping into something
> archetypally before they ever incarnate.
>
> It's yet another clue that the purely physical
> interpretation of genetics leaves a lot to be desired. This
> one is going to be a hard nut to crack, because in the West
> we are 100% sold on the purely materialistic theory of
> genetics, despite the fact that I think there are major
> holes in it. Physical genetics (like the physical brain) is
> the tool for higher levels of reality to function through,
> not the original cause or source.
>
> Steve S.
When hillbillies come back as hillbillies, is it called
reintarnation? The reason I ask is that reincarnation is a
joke. It's just another bit of silly mythology invented by
selfish people who think they deserve to have more than one
chance to live on Earth, and a way to scare superstitious Hindu
kids into following someone's rules.
|
