On 6 Oct 2006 00:37:38 -0700, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<science@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Are UFO Debunkers inherently evil?
>
>Q: Sir Arthur, are UFO debunker inherently evil or do they just act
>that way to get attention?
>
>Signed Wondering
>
>A: Thank you for your most engaging question, Wondering. UFO Debunkers
>usually act like they are a bunch of mean-spirited screwballs, but that
>can be explained way because nobody with an IQ above 50 believes them
>anymore. The most recent polls indicate that debunkers aren't
>fooling anybody (including themselves) with their utterly ridiculous
>excuses that tries to explain away the scientific data proving ET's
>are here: hedge hogs, time-compressed crash-test dummies and stealth
>blimps. Most of the UFO debunkers have lost all semblance of
>rationality, coherence and even sobriety. Half of all debunkers are
>now in mental-health institutions waiting for their electric shock
>treatments, the other half are on very powerful anti-depression
>medication such as Prozac, Paxil, Demoral, Risperdal and Wellbutrin.
>This explains why the debunkers act viciously evil. But to answer your
>question which is are UFO Debunkers inherently evil, I would say that
>the scientific proof dictates the answer has to be an overwhelming
>yes!! This is why the military must apprehend all debunkers and toss
>them into Re-Education Resorts. You see, it is for their own good and
>the good of society. In fact, in the near future most debunkers will
>beg to be let into these new Camps. This is why we should encourage
>the debunkers to start their trek now so they won't be left out if
>these camps get too full, as is often re****ted. Luckily for most
>debunkers, there will be a variety of "tabloid" papers around the
>compound, which the debunkers like to read.
Howdy Sir Arthur !
There are many types of debunkers all with different missions.
Because some would do it to protect their religious interests, some to
protect military secrets, and on, and on.
Even people in alt.binaries.ufo.files
think I'm a debunker just because I liked to see the funny side also.
I care about people and life and Earth and space.
But I'm just gonna be myself.
Because I don't like many prominent serious people, i.e. the old
leaders in Iran or some of the Gospel speakers on TV, etc.
At the moment I'm reading this ...
http://www.theyfly.com/newsflash/newsflash5.htm
And that is bloody serious stuff too.
It's the main reason I am friendly with Charles, because he is not a
serious old crappy narrow minded fart all the time like some other
people.
I enjoy the serious data. And seriously caring. For example this I was
reading today ...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/260906venturaquestions.htm
But it is not healthy to be a serious Taliban stopping kids from
flying kites or people from playing soccer. And making people go to
war. Too stupid, serious, people, caused this whole mess too ...
"Russia School taken Hostage by Terrorist - September 1, 2004."
.... instead of growing a brain !!
If you want to see a good brain, that is sometimes kindly serious, and
witty, funny, intelligent, and truthful .... read Richard Causton in
The Buddha in Daily Life.
And other serious information is good though.
For example this page...
http://www.metatech.org/contact_extraterrestrials_intervention.html
That is serious, but it is clever serious, not stupid serious.
As for The Galactic Federation updates...
they seem like a collection of truths taken from knowledge of the
universe and then mismatched up and mixed into a collection of
gobeldygook, part fact, fun, clever serious, news of the day, and a
story. Although there could be more truth in their updates than I
think. But written not by The Galactic Federation.
That would mean their deadlines are close.
Anyway, have a nice weekend !!
I might go and upload another picture to alt.binaries.ufo.files
and then read the 'normal' Yahoo! or BBC news.
|
