"Tim" <delaney.timothy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:1160154478.872308.278470@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:
>> Are UFO Debunkers inherently evil?
>>
>> Q: Sir Arthur, are UFO debunker inherently evil or do they just act
>> that way to get attention?
>>
>> Signed Wondering
>>
>> A: Thank you for your most engaging question, Wondering. UFO
Debunkers
>> usually act like they are a bunch of mean-spirited screwballs, but
that
>> can be explained way because nobody with an IQ above 50 believes them
>> anymore. The most recent polls indicate that debunkers aren't
>> fooling anybody (including themselves) with their utterly ridiculous
>> excuses that tries to explain away the scientific data proving ET's
>> are here: hedge hogs, time-compressed crash-test dummies and stealth
>> blimps. Most of the UFO debunkers have lost all semblance of
>> rationality, coherence and even sobriety. Half of all debunkers are
>> now in mental-health institutions waiting for their electric shock
>> treatments, the other half are on very powerful anti-depression
>> medication such as Prozac, Paxil, Demoral, Risperdal and Wellbutrin.
>> This explains why the debunkers act viciously evil. But to answer
your
>> question which is are UFO Debunkers inherently evil, I would say that
>> the scientific proof dictates the answer has to be an overwhelming
>> yes!! This is why the military must apprehend all debunkers and toss
>> them into Re-Education Resorts. You see, it is for their own good and
>> the good of society. In fact, in the near future most debunkers will
>> beg to be let into these new Camps. This is why we should encourage
>> the debunkers to start their trek now so they won't be left out if
>> these camps get too full, as is often re****ted. Luckily for most
>> debunkers, there will be a variety of "tabloid" papers around the
>> compound, which the debunkers like to read.
>
> Hmmmmmmm. Surely, you are just trying to amass Loki points, right?
>
> But on the off-chance that you are serious, let me see if I have gotten
> this straight.
>
> You believe that some alien civilization has mastered the science of
> interstellar travel, and has visited Earth numerous times. This
> presumes technological capabilities far beyond anything we can aspire
> to in the foreseeable future, right?
>
> So, why is it that our planet is littered with their crashed spacecraft
> and their bodies? I have seen four or five accounts of alleged alien
> spacecraft crashes. How can these aliens be so advanced as to conquer
> space, but so inept at flying about this planet's atmosphere? Has it
> occurred to you that this is just not believable?
>
> Tim
>
>
What is believable? And what is unbelievable?
Those who don't believe in UFOs - ie. of the few genuine cases
which pass the initial : it's not a known aircraft, etc type, it's not
a misunidentified (not a weather pattern or astronomical object etc),
there is attached to it --- who covers up or maintains the status quo
over the acknowledgement of these sightings -
ie. the conspiracy comes into view (whether it be innocent and
uncoordinated) or purposeful.
And so anyone who seriously believes in the existence of genuine
UFOs (unidentified, etc are eliminated) ends up putting their
reputation on the line [as much as those who re****t the original
sighting, and those who cover, pass on this info].
How long has our civilisation been in existence? Continually?
If you have an alien (ET) civilisation that has a continual history
of tens of thousands of years, or maybe even a million?
What breakthroughs in technology have they gained? That we can only
dream of?
They are not perfect beings - and so crashes will still be possible,
given they are so far away from their home, and help.
Harvey
|
