On Mar 25, 12:42 am, Katie Dune <KatieD...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Again channeling for some entity that seems to be obsessed with the
> nature of time. I believe him, but don't blame anyone for taking what
> he says with an _enormous_ grain of salt.
>
> <begin transmission>
>
> Humans have long known about the possibility of time travel, though no
> human in recorded history has ever been able to come up with a theory
> of time travel that is both logically consistent and able to
> successfully explain what few things we -do- know about the nature of
> time.
>
> There is a connection between the mindset of a species and their
> potential for ever discovering time travel. It's almost as if the
> universe toys with us, as if our world is shaped by an intelligence
> which transcends it. That is not the case, but it certainly seems
> like it once one begins to understand the conditions which must exist
> before any being can succeed in time travel.
>
> The gist is that a traveler cannot interfere in any way, shape or form
> with any other era in time. Any given traveler may only interact with
> its native tem****al realm - in any other time, all they can do is
> observe.
>
> And yet, it's not physically impossible for a time traveler once in
> the past to interact with it like a normal person might. A
> contradiction? No, believe it or not.
>
> Any time traveler is just as physically real in the time in which they
> arrive as the natives of that time. A time traveler can reach out and
> do things to the world of their past. The hitch is that once they do,
> they cease to exist, along with the entire new timeline (or what some
> call a "world line") which they'd begun initiating with their action.
>
> From this, you should be able to tell that the only timelines that
> survive are timelines in which nobody ever tried to go back in time
> and alter history.
>
> See how that works? You _can_ go back in time and alter history, but
> doing so will obliviate any timeline in which such an attempt was in
> your future, leaving only timelines in which you either would not or
> could not attempt to do such a thing.
>
> Modern man has glimpsed what might be necessary for time travel, but
> they won't be able to use it if they approach it like they do most
> other endeavors. The only people or groups who can succeed at time
> travel are those who will take every step needed to insure that they
> alter nothing of the past during their travels.
>
> Of course it should be easy enough to be in such a group and then once
> in the past, change your mind and act out. Shouldn't it? Again, no.
>
> If a timeline emerges in which a group is able to travel through time
> because they take extra care to avoid altering the past, and at some
> point an individual joins that group with the intention of altering
> the past, all timelines in which that individual was going to make
> such an attempt would obliviate. This would leave only timelines in
> which that individual may exist, but had only ever thought about such
> a plot in a daydream sort of way without ever trying to act it out.
> The group of time travelers would still have formed, but the part of
> their history in which the rebel traveler joined them will never have
> occurred.
>
> As one might expect of any phenomenon, there is certainly room for
> occasional fluctuation and deviation. But it's a very narrow space,
> and very easy to slip outside of. However, by exploiting that narrow
> space, a timeline can be "groomed", in a manner of speaking.
>
> Suppose this narrow space is 1% of the total content of a given
> timeline. This means that a time traveler can alter the past by that
> 1%, but only if it doesn't cause any sort of paradox to erupt. A
> timeline can be altered that way very, very slowly by repeated
> exploitation of that 1%. The timeline overall will consist of the
> same events at the same points in time, but the "look" of the timeline
> will change. Insignificant details which have little to no impact
> upon the world around them are fairly malleable, but only to a point.
> After so much alteration, the timeline will reach a state where it
> cannot be altered any further without unlea****ng an almost cataclysmic
> maelstrom of changes within the affected region of history, as well as
> all of that history's futures. That is where the obliviation event
> kicks in again, and so order is maintained.
>
> There are ways around this paradox clause, but you can only discover
> them once you've succeeded in traveling through time. The multiverse
> theory is quite true, so once you manage to work your way around the
> paradox clause, you'll be able to alter your history - but only by
> creating a new timeline in which your altered version of history
> occurred. The original history that you wanted to alter will still
> have happened.
>
> The ability to travel through time eventually leads to the ability to
> generate new timelines. When it does, a species finds itself capable
> of "farming" timelines. Simply generate a timeline, hunker down onto
> whatever world you're planning to mine resources from, and take
> whatever you want. Growing and harnessing the resources of timelines
> in such a way is a very common practice among species who have
> attained time travel. It puts to end the need for competition, as an
> endless supply of anything you desire can easily be obtained.
>
> There are, of course, rules to follow even in that cir***stance. But
> we'll chat about those later. For now, this communication is ended.
>
> <end transmission>
That was most informitive ummm...you forgot to metion the infinite
sign crossroads area that is imparitive for time travel entry ...sort-
a-like the vortex pin-point area...right?? I found that I feel this
area intensly like the flood gates opening but only at certain
times. Anyway thanx for clear info that's always
helpfull .
I.C.Blue
|
