Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranet Science > Re: Quantum cos...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 8 Topic 58 of 151
Post > Topic >>

Re: Quantum cosmology

by "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 12, 2004 at 03:12 AM

"Keshav Kallianpur" <keshav999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:416b3c6a.1107447@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> What is your opinion on the theories propounded by Anna Hayes with
> regard to the structure of the universe?
>
> Do you consider that her ideas of 'parti***' and 'partici' as the
> fundamental energy/matter interface hold any weight?

Typical crank abduction rubbish - at least if it is the Anna Hayes I know
of.

Thanks
Bill

>
>
> --
> Om Shanti Shanti Shanti (Om Peace Peace Peace)
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Quantum cosmology
keshav999@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2004-10-12 02:12:06 
Re: Quantum cosmology
"Bill Hobba" &l  2004-10-12 03:12:16 
Re: Quantum cosmology
"Keith Willshaw"  2004-10-12 09:13:41 
Re: Quantum cosmology
"tim gueguen" &  2004-10-12 19:36:43 
Re: Quantum cosmology
dubious@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-14 21:58:11 
Re: Quantum cosmology
"Ilja Schmelzer"  2004-10-21 13:07:12 
Re: Quantum cosmology
dubious@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-23 08:14:20 
Re: Quantum cosmology
zzbunker@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-10-15 12:56:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 19:43:39 CDT 2008.