"altheim" <altheim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "lucianarchy" <lucianarchy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> What was good was that many of the winners on the NY Lottery who had
>> predicted correctly ( and there were thousands of correct tickets
>> bought ) that 911 would be drawn, in that order, on that day, at that
>> time, gave their winnings to charity.
>>
>> The 'coincidences' are unprecendented. And if you put all those events
>> alongside the data produced by the Global Consciousness Project at the
>> time of the 9/11 attacks, then you have to consider alternatives to
>> 'coincidence' .
>>
>
> Luci, as usual I haven't a clue what you are talking about. Could
> you please leave in the text you are replying to so I and the rest
> of your poor readers get the context.
The doofus thinks that when you buy a lottery ticket, you're making a
prediction. Such hebephrenic nonsense tells us what the rest of her
goofy blabbering is worth. Still, it's funny that she blithely
pronounces the coincidences unprecedented without trying to justify or
even define that off-the-wall assertion. Anyway, what she's yapping
about is that another turkey is excitedly gobbling about the fact that of
all the millions or billions of processes that could have yielded "911"
on a certain day, a couple of them did.
"Global Consciousness Project"...an experiment to see how many gullible
fools there are. Luci should count double.
Luci is totally puzzled as to why you don't see what was on her screen
when she typed her stupid reply.
|
