Re: The Real Junk Science

In article <5mpv81h1uae80onp5uuedb0nv06hm08be3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
   Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Fri, 20 May 05 14:03:21 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>> You're a physicist?  Yeah, sure.
>>>
>>>	Yes. And I regard the opinions of others you are repeating from 
>>journalism majors very dumb.
>>
>>Do you regard the opinions of the National Academy of Sciences as dumb? 

>>NASA?  EPA?  NOAA?  IPCC?
>
>NASA's data does not sup****t the global warming hoax.


You are a liar.

>  Neither does
>NOAA's.  


Liue #2

>The IPCC is nothing for a small collection of tax dollar
>whores who had to munge, mine, and lie about their own data in order
>to attempt to sup****t their preformed conclusions and beg for more
>money. 

Lie #3

>
>And the EPA?  Are you serious?   ROTFLMAO!
>
>William R. James
>

Is lying someone you learned to be good at, or is it an innate skill?