Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranet Skeptic > Re: The Real Ju...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 26 of 115 Topic 148 of 215
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Real Junk Science

by Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 25, 2005 at 11:05 PM

On Sat, 21 May 2005 10:28:55 GMT, Matt Giwer
<matt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Wm James wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 May 05 14:20:36 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
>> wrote:
>
>>>We're not talking about the natural greenhouse effect, which has been
in 
>>>balance for millions of years.  We're talking about the additional
warming, 
>>>which has been happening for just the last 120 years.  And it's caused
by 
>>>increased CO2 in the atmosphere, which in turn is caused by human 
>>>activities.
>
>> Your fantasy, not reality.   Here on planet earth, there's no evidence
>> to sup****t your claim.  In fact, there's plenty to the contrary.  The
>> global warming hoax is identical to every end-of-the-world scam
>> peddled by superstitious whacos for thousands of years.  Nothing but a
>> goofy idea that doesn't even qualify as a theory, silly nonsense that
>> fliesin the face of science while claiming to be su****ted by science.
>> Just like any s****oil or fat pill infomercial, totally meaningless.
>
>	Careful.
>
>	You can see from the posts the treehuggers are warming up the stakes.
Their problem is finding 
>stakes without sacrificing the sacred trees.

ROTFLMAO!  Good point!  :)

William R. James
 




 115 Posts in Topic:
The Real Junk Science
Dan Clore <clore@[EMAI  2005-05-15 01:55:06 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"James" <kin  2005-05-15 11:01:39 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2005-05-15 16:35:26 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"James" <kin  2005-05-15 20:10:40 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2005-05-17 18:00:38 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-15 20:55:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-16 02:22:49 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-16 10:29:04 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-16 11:54:45 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-17 09:06:19 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-18 14:20:36 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-20 08:24:39 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-20 14:03:21 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-21 10:23:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-23 11:33:53 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-25 07:30:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Ghod" <ghod  2005-05-25 15:15:31 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-26 10:18:29 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-25 13:17:35 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-26 10:19:14 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-21 20:57:53 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-23 11:36:46 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-25 23:04:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-20 20:29:42 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-21 10:28:55 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-25 23:05:01 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-16 17:06:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-16 20:15:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-17 17:07:57 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-17 21:25:04 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-18 14:30:19 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-19 21:14:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-20 13:55:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-21 21:15:12 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-23 11:37:46 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-25 23:16:07 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-26 21:49:09 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-28 21:18:09 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-29 06:03:06 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Ian St. John"   2005-05-29 10:34:28 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-29 22:25:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-29 22:21:01 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-30 12:24:27 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-30 23:35:04 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-31 15:56:47 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-06-01 17:42:08 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-31 11:43:50 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-06-01 17:25:07 
Re: The Real Junk Science
swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-23 16:32:41 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-25 23:20:07 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-26 13:35:24 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-28 21:25:06 
Re: The Real Junk Science
swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-29 14:07:45 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-29 22:40:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-30 15:47:06 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-31 13:15:04 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-30 12:38:32 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-31 13:03:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-30 18:01:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-31 13:32:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-31 19:05:35 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-06-01 17:58:07 
Re: The Real Junk Science
swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-06-02 00:10:35 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-06-04 20:33:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-30 12:26:21 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-31 13:36:01 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-26 21:59:35 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-28 21:40:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-29 06:03:01 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-29 22:18:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-30 12:27:37 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-31 11:46:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-18 19:32:43 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-19 22:05:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-20 16:26:57 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-21 22:10:04 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-22 19:10:49 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-25 23:57:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-20 14:00:43 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-21 21:36:04 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-23 11:42:18 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-26 00:23:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-26 13:36:42 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-28 21:42:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-26 22:02:38 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-28 21:44:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Ghod" <ghod  2005-05-25 17:05:20 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-25 23:07:06 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-16 11:52:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-16 19:58:01 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Stan de SD" &l  2005-06-07 01:49:20 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Werner Hetzner <whetzn  2005-05-15 15:30:42 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Dan Clore <clore@[EMAI  2005-05-15 08:59:42 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"James" <kin  2005-05-15 20:13:25 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-15 16:30:42 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Werner Hetzner <whetzn  2005-05-15 22:26:09 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-16 00:36:36 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Werner Hetzner <whetzn  2005-05-16 03:25:15 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wally Anglesea™ <wangl  2005-05-16 03:45:41 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-31 13:44:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-16 09:06:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-16 11:59:00 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Werner Hetzner <whetzn  2005-05-17 00:14:55 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Ghod" <ghod  2005-05-25 17:36:10 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-16 20:23:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-17 16:44:49 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-17 20:49:03 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-18 17:56:08 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-19 21:07:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-20 02:18:36 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Wm James <wrjames.remo  2005-05-21 22:29:02 
Re: The Real Junk Science
"Coby Beck" <  2005-05-16 17:13:44 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-16 10:31:26 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2005-05-15 16:33:17 
Re: The Real Junk Science
Matt Giwer <matt@[EMAI  2005-05-16 10:10:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 8:06:34 CDT 2008.