Re: Unintelligent Design

In talk.origins ianparker2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>The main argument against Evolution is the failure to produce AI.
>Intelligence has proved too complex to be generated in a random way and
>too complex even for us to understand.

>Evolution isn't just a biological concept, it, in the shape of Genetic
>Algotithms, is a mathematical and computational concept. Ee can now ask
>the question as to whether Evolution could have occured randomly. My
>own investigations cast doubt on whether scientists really believe in
>random evolution.

>An army of PhDs is working on AI. They are all working on specific
>projects in weak AI. No respectable peer group believes either in
>strong AI, or that the route to objectives in weak AI is through
>Genetic Algorithms.

<snip>

I think that you'd best examine your primary assumption
about AI.  Life doesn't use the sort of AI that mathematicians
study or computer science types build.

But evolution did, eventually, develop this sort of AI.
It did it by evolving humans who developed it.

    ---- Paul J. Gans