Re: The Real Junk Science

On Thu, 26 May 05 13:36:42 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

>In article <dkma91dj4crs4k1916dgqos40a959qloe2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>   Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>On Mon, 23 May 05 11:42:18 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <ivqv81tbltm3rviv8ges5j5cpsd9q9h09o@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>   Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>You keep spouting this garbage; either you do not understand the 
>science, 
>>>or 
>>>>>you're deliberately lying.  Either way, just shut the hell up.
>>>>
>>>>Ah, shut up if I'm not willing to parrot the pseudoscience and play
>>>>along with the hoax?   Not a chance.   I you want to sell your
>>>>quackery to the ignorant m*****, you'll have to fight those practicing
>>>>science all the way.  
>>>
>>>Then I guess all the scientific journals, all the scientists, all the 
>>>scientific agencies, are wrong and only you and a handful of (other)
nut 
>>>cases have seen through us!  LOL!
>>
>>All?  If by "all" you meann the tiny minority of fanatic kooks that
>>you parot without questioning, then perhaps so. 
>
>No, I mean the National Academy of Sciences.  Heard of them?  I mean the 
>American Geophysical Union, NASA, NOAA, and EPA.  I mean the hundreds of 
>articles in scientific journals.
>
>None of which you'll read because they're not right-wing propaganda.


If you can't read their data, just say so.  I have read it, you
hanen't.   I have pointed you to it, but all you can do is whine
referring to what a handful of frauds are claiming about the data. 

William R. James