Re: Unintelligent Design

"stoney" <stoney@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:bqmj91pissuft538jgcci63igf7vrsg711@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 26 May 2005 05:01:09 -0700, ianparker2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >The main argument against Evolution is the failure to produce AI.
> >Intelligence has proved too complex to be generated in a random way and
> >too complex even for us to understand.
>
> (sigh)  Once again the usual ignorant idiocies are raised.
>
> [snip horse ****]
>
> How sad.

I almost live for the day when someone posts a "The main argument against
evolution is it's failure to produce (or explain) ..XXXX...", and then
within a few days a discovery, or accomplishment based upon the ToE,
produces or explains "XXXX". But then again, this happens whenever a new
transitional species or form is discovered, and they still keep bleating
like sheep.

Boikat
-- 
<42><