Re: Unintelligent Design

"Boikat" <boikat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:X4lme.29042$8S5.8940@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "stoney" <stoney@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:bqmj91pissuft538jgcci63igf7vrsg711@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On 26 May 2005 05:01:09 -0700, ianparker2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >
> > >The main argument against Evolution is the failure to produce AI.
> > >Intelligence has proved too complex to be generated in a random way
and
> > >too complex even for us to understand.
> >
> > (sigh)  Once again the usual ignorant idiocies are raised.
> >
> > [snip horse ****]
> >
> > How sad.
>
> I almost live for the day when someone posts a "The main argument
against
> evolution is it's failure to produce (or explain) ..XXXX...", and then
> within a few days a discovery, or accomplishment based upon the ToE,
> produces or explains "XXXX". But then again, this happens whenever a new
> transitional species or form is discovered, and they still keep bleating
> like sheep.

I remember someone still siting the "scientists don't even know how bees
fly" (as if that means bees are held aloft by supernatural devine power)
more than a year after it was explained by science!  Of course I've also
had
a Christian university student dismiss all science with the line
"Scientists
don't even know what causes rainbows!".