Re: The Real Junk Science

On Mon, 30 May 05 12:38:32 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

>In article <s32l91t1hh35d6nbe882v6lj7n1s5jrp2o@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>   Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>On Sun, 29 May 2005 14:07:45 +0000 (UTC), swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Eric
>>Swanson) wrote:
>
>>>
>>>The fact of Ozone Depletion is rather firmly established in the 
>atmospheric 
>>>sciences by now.
>>
>>So you are saying the global warming hoax is bogus because the ozone
>>hoax explains the cooling?  Even admiitting the cooling is admitting
>>one of the hoaxes. So which hox are you going to stick to now?
>>
>
>Next you'll be telling us about that "earth is not the center of the 
>universe" hoax, or that "earth is billions of years old hoax."


So your argument to sup****t your position is entirely based on further
meaningless predictions that are doomed to failure?  At least you are
consistant. 

William R. James