Re: The Real Junk Science

On Mon, 30 May 05 12:26:21 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

>In article <6p9i91l4qsf65ho6o1n5uhjtijkg27dedb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>   Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>On Thu, 26 May 05 13:35:24 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <9jja91dt5o9bemi9de14jd13ol2j6gkuo9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>   Wm James <wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:32:41 +0000 (UTC), swanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Eric
>>>>Swanson) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <0upv819pc1dvacngmdndaukns6qvvq6a8c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
>>>wrjames.remove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 05 13:55:10 GMT, lparker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Lloyd Parker)
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature/
>>>>>
>>>>>[cut]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You are lying.  This is out of date.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It's a direct quote from http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature/
>>>>>>>>Look it up and stop making a fool of yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>>[cut]
>>>>>
>>>>>Note that at the bottom of the page is the data:
>>>>>
>>>>>     "Last Updated: June 14, 2000 "
>>>>>
>>>>>It's very out of date.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>NASA does not say there is no warming trend over the entire earth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>NASA's data doesn't show it. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>BTW, did you read that link?  That IS NASA and this is a direct
quote
>>>>>>copied and pasted:
>>>>>>"The lower tropospheric data are often cited as evidence against
>>>>>>global warming, because they have as yet failed to show any warming
>>>>>>trend when averaged over the entire Earth. The lower stratospheric
>>>>>>data show a significant cooling trend, which is consistent with
ozone
>>>>>>depletion. In addition to the recent cooling, large tem****ary
warming
>>>>>>perturbations may be seen in the data due to two major volcanic
>>>>>>eruptions: El Chichon in March 1982, and Mt. Pinatubo in June 1991."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What part of "they have as yet failed to show any warming trend when
>>>>>>averaged over the entire Earth" and "The lower stratospheric data
show
>>>>>>a significant cooling trend" and "In addition to the recent cooling"
>>>>>>is too complicated for you to read and comprehend?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The latest data from Spencer and Christy's analysis is found at:
>>>>>
>>>>>     http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/uahncdc.lt
>>>>>
>>>>>The trend data is at the bottom of the page.
>>>>>Note that their result shows a global trend of 0.09 C/dec.  Also take

>note 
>>>>>of the fact that the Northern Hemisphere data shows much greater
warming 
>>>>>than the global value.
>>>>>
>>>>>Other research groups, including NASA groups, have found greater
warming
>>>>>in the same raw data.  The difference between the various analytical
>>>>>approaches has been discussed many times and a new re****t on the 
>question
>>>>>is due out shortly.  Stay tuned.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I showed you NASA's own pages:
>>>>http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature/
>>>>
>>>>Now you want to pont to a university's pages as proof that NASA's OWN
>>>>PAGES do not reflect what NASA says?
>>>>
>>>>Be serious!  Like I said:
>>>>It's a direct quote from http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature/
>>>>Look it up and stop making a fool of yourself.
>>>>
>>>>nasa.gov is NASA's domain.  uah.edu is NOT NASA's domain.
>>>
>>>What you cited isn't NASA either.  It's Spencer and Christy's pet
project:
>>
>>So you are saying nasa.gov isn't NASA?  
>>
>>>"The GHCC is a partner****p comprised of organizational elements from
NASA 
>>>Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), the State of Alabama's Space
Science 
>>>and Technology Alliance (SSTA), and the Universities Space Research 
>>>Association (USRA)"
>>
>>And you think that's not affiliated with NASA?
>>
>>>So the only association with NASA is "organizational elements".
>>
>>Yeah, Mike Moore launched the satellite too, huh?
>
>Hey, I quoted from their web page.  If you're too dumb to understand...

You should have read it... If you can.

>>>NASA is at www.nasa.gov.  Try, for example, 
>>>
>>>http://eobglossary.gsfc.nasa.gov//Library/GlobalWarming/warming2.html
>>
>>http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature/
 is nasa
>>http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/MSU/hl_measuretemp.htm
 is nasa
>>
>>What part of http://wwwghcc.msfc.NASA.GOV/temperature/
do you not
>>understand?
>>
>
>I understand the msfc is not NASA.  You obviously do not.

Oh, so now NASA is just a web hosting company, huh?

>>>>William R. James
>>>>
>>>What part of "ozone depletion" do you not understand?
>>
>>"Consistant with ozone depletion" is not a claim of ozone depletion,
>>which is a different hoax.  Trying to exlain why data doesn't match
>>one hoax by blaming anpther hoax doesn't alter the fact that the data
>>doesn't sup****t the first one. 
>
>Liar.

Your typical attempt to sup****t your BS is noted.   One would thing
you'd learn some new lines by now.

>>I keep telling you to read the data, but you seem incapable of reading
>>anything other than parroted editorials refering to and lying about
>>the data as the closest excuse for "evidence" you can find. 
>
>I keep referring you TO the data, such as at GISS at the NASA site.  You,
of 
>course, refuse to look at it because you don't want any facts to confuse 
>you.  You'd make a good Bush advisor.

I have read the data, you haven't, you only parrot the BS you've been
trained to parrot.   You even resort to references to Bush!  ROTFLMAO!
This is just too funny!

William R. James